Search for: "In re: Justice v." Results 3001 - 3020 of 18,400
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2008, 7:24 pm
So now they're litigating against the Department of Justice. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am by Bernard Bell
Smith, 494 U.S. 872, 883–85 (1990), and re-establish the “balancing” test established by Sherbert v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 3:42 am by Russ Bensing
” I don’t know whether five Ohio Supreme Court justices believe in Santa Clause or the Easter Bunny, but in State v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 9:12 am by Charlene Richer
Ireland) quashed the conviction and a re-trial was ordered. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 2:43 pm by Bexis
We’re rather tired of the other side, abetted by the flawed reasoning in Desiano v. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 10:04 am by Jeff Gamso
  (Hell, this post is Part V in a series with that title.) [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:57 am by John Elwood
Though we’re just a week into the new Term, OT2014 has already had more than its share of headlines, with the Justices issuing a slew of emergency orders on hot topics ranging from gay marriage to voting rights to abortion. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
CONSTITUTIONNEL (DROIT) : La Loi sur l’immatriculation des armes à feu québécoise n’est pas invalide constitutionnellement, car son caractère véritable est la sécurité publique et elle se rattache aux compétences provinciales en matière de propriété et du droit civil ainsi que de l’administration de la justice. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 8:35 am by Michael Fox
Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.The use of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2006, 7:33 pm
Scalia, 70, has consistently voted to limit the use of race in school admissions and has called for the 1973 Roe v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Justice Edward White Justice White gave as his rationale a citation from a previous case [United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 2:08 pm
  It may be an appealable order, Justice Sanchez says, but it's not the judgment. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
  Speaking through Justice Amy Coney Barrett, the Justices elaborated upon their less constricted version of the “authority or duty” test in a way that provides some guidance to government officials. [read post]