Search for: "Judge v. United States" Results 3001 - 3020 of 35,336
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2014, 11:53 am
The United States has the harshest piracy law in the Western world – among the harshest anywhere. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 2:08 pm by Dwight Sullivan
CAAF has posted its decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 6:06 am
United States, Docket No. 05-6761-pr (2d Cir. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 12:31 pm
The next part of Judge Posner’s discussion: I noticed a citation in the court’s opinion to a case from my court, United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 1:07 pm by Pierre Bergeron
In a highly unusual decision, the Sixth Circuit reversed a district court’s denial of immunity for a lawsuit brought against a state court judge in Ohio, Bright v. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 9:18 am by Gregory J. Brodzik
Judge Sleet, however, denied without prejudice Edwards' motion in limine which sought to preclude Medtronic from presenting or arguing to the jury "hypothetical uses of the porcine pericardial tissue that Medtronic supplied and/or supplies from the United States to Mexico." [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 11:55 am by Benjamin Wittes
Department of State, has the following analysis of the International Court of Justice’s decision Friday in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 12:45 pm by Tom Lamb
.: 1:08-cv-4119, is scheduled to start on January 14, 2013 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York ("SDNY") United States District Court Judge Joseph F. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 11:26 am by Florian Mueller
Robart of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, famous in patent circles for his antisuit injunction and FRAND determination in the Microsoft v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 12:35 pm by David Oscar Markus
"[I]n determining whether reforms are needed, and especially in determining whether the existing guideline should be burdened with even more adjustments, the Commission should examine whether our system already provides an adequate solution for the claimed 'unacceptable' outcomes the Department complains about," Gleeson wrote in United States v. [read post]