Search for: "Kennedy Thomas" Results 3001 - 3020 of 4,886
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2011, 9:10 pm by Lyle Denniston
These are the cases that are ready for the Justices, in the order in which they were filed: Thomas More Law Center, et al., v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 4:43 am
My own tentative view is more nearly the opposite of Justice Thomas's. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 5:10 pm by Kevin
JUSTICE KENNEDY: I just have to agree with Justice Ginsburg....I just can't believe that.... [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 11:35 am by Orin Kerr
Thomas More, 651 F.3d at 560–61 (Sutton, J., concurring). [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 8:09 am by Kevin Russell
” Representing petitioners Akio and Fusako Kawashima was Thomas J. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:00 pm by Tom Goldstein
  Justice Kennedy did not join that part of the PLIVA opinion, so the presumption has yet to be disavowed and seemingly has the support of five Justices. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 12:10 pm by Kali Borkoski
Casey, the abortion case, is an obvious example, where Justices Souter and Kennedy and O’Connor ended up writing a joint opinion. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 6:37 am by Tom Goldstein
Given DOMA’s unprecedented intrusion into the states’ domestic-relations sphere, I would expect a staunch federalism buff such as Thomas vote to strike it down, alongside Kennedy and the four “liberal” Justices (perhaps in a separate concurrence that stresses federalism and eschews the Romer rationale). [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 7:44 am by Jeralyn
The prosecution and defense gave their closing arguments Monday in the trial of Russian businessman Viktor Bout, accused of agreeing with pretend FARC members to sell weapons to be used against the U.S. in Colombia. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 6:26 am by Kedar
Justice Thomas has proven unwilling to compromise on the Establishment making a plurality opinion the best option available, assuming – and these are big assumptions – (1) that the Chief Justice and Justices Scalia and Alito could reach a common consesus, and (2) that Kennedy would join them. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 11:32 am by Nathan
Our take is a Roberts-Scalia-Kennedy-Thomas-Ginsburg-Alito majority against a Sixth Amendment remedy. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 9:43 am by Gritsforbreakfast
But just because Justices Alito, Thomas, Roberts, Scalia and Kennedy (at least) would probably consider it constitutional doesn't make it any less creepy. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 9:09 am by Staci Zaretsky
The Legal Times has more on the grammatical and stylistic discord that occurred in those pages: Justice Clarence Thomas, writing for the Court (and joined by Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. and Justices Samuel Alito Jr., Anthony Kennedy, and Antonin Scalia), concluded that the Kansas statute was not unconstitutional. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 3:11 am by Lyle Denniston
At 11 a.m. next Tuesday, the Supreme Court will hold one hour of oral argument on a plea to create a new constitutional remedy against private companies who work for a federal government agency. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 7:21 am by Conor McEvily
Thomas, which was argued earlier this month. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 7:41 am by Joshua Matz
Sunday marked Justice Thomas’s twentieth year on the Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 6:24 pm by Mike Rappaport
I discuss criticism of Thomas by Randall Kennedy and Lincoln Caplan over at the Originalism Blog. [read post]