Search for: "Lee v State"
Results 3001 - 3020
of 4,493
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2011, 7:49 am
£55, Mr Lee concluded that this was relatively straightforward because it was comparable to the management fee of £52 the council charged on private sector leases. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 7:49 am
£55, Mr Lee concluded that this was relatively straightforward because it was comparable to the management fee of £52 the council charged on private sector leases. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 2:52 am
This post (cross-posted from my Retail Patent Litigation Blog) focuses upon a presentation regarding the state of patent damages law and specifically reasonable royalty analysis by Mark Pedigo of Crowe Horwath and Lee Johnston of Dorsey & Whitney. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 12:29 pm
The Court denied the application for injunctive relief in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 7:54 am
“In response, defense counsel stated, `Right. [read post]
22 May 2021, 2:46 pm
The social events and legislative history leading to the enactment and promulgation of the NSL as a national law applied to the HKSAR under BL 18 have been summarised in HKSAR v Lai Chee Ying, ante. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 7:02 am
United States and Black v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 7:52 am
& Clinics, Inc. v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 7:52 am
& Clinics, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 7:43 am
Of last week’s 16 relists, the court dumped nearly half, including United States Forest Service v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:12 am
Lee, 15-446, presenting two questions about review of decisions rendered by the Patent and Trial Appeal Board; Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 4:30 am
In United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:04 am
More on Atkins v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 3:00 am
The Eighth Circuit also referred to its opinion in Hood v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 6:47 pm
(IP finance) United States US Patents – Decisions CAFC: In re Katz (part 2): Indefiniteness of computer processes (Patently-O) CAFC: Altair illustrates how to win by losing: Altair v Leddynamics (IPBiz) District Court E D Wisconsin: In Re Seagate does not dictate standard for pleading willful infringement claim: Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation, et. al. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 3:11 am
., v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:25 pm
” [via FindLaw] Bobby O’Lee Phillips v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:21 am
Justin Moongyu Lee; Rebecca Taewon Lee; Thomas Edward Kent; American Immigrant Investment Fund I, LLC; Biofuel Venture IV, LLC; Biofuel Venture V, LLC; Nexland, Inc., dba Nexland Investment Group; and Nexsun Ethanol, LLC Case number: 14-cv-06865 (United States District Court for the Central District of California) Case filed: September 3, 2014 Qualifying Judgment/Order: October 29, 2015 11/30/2015 2/28/2016 2015-129 In the Matter of Blackstone Management… [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 7:49 pm
The court referenced Lee v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 2:36 am
Icaza, 492 F.3d 967 (8th Cir. 2007), and United States v. [read post]
