Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 3001 - 3020
of 4,051
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2022, 2:11 pm
From Bailey v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 4:23 am
Lord Sumption neatly summarised the issues at stake here in the Court's judgment on 17 April 2013 [press release here]: "The ordinary use of the internet will involve the creation of temporary copies at several stages. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 4:49 pm
The extent to which the state provides information and guidance to members of the public may be relevant here: the clearer the information from the state, the lower might be the public interest in knowing the details about particular cases. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:09 pm
The House of Lords held that the City Council was entitled to regard the applicants as homeless under section 175 (3) of the 1996 Act, but nevertheless to leave them there for a limited period. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 9:48 pm
The US typically has four levels of jurisdiction Federal, State, county and local. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 4:17 pm
The House of Lords loses the plot The first seismic change in the law of defamation as it applies to the media occurred in 1999 in the case of Reynolds v Times Newspapers. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 2:27 am
The case will be heard on 13 and 14 November 2018 by Lords Kerr, Wilson, Sumption, Hodge and Briggs. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:35 am
NVidia v Hardware Labs [2016] EWHC 3135(December 2016)This was the exam question posed here. [read post]
8 May 2018, 6:37 am
Lord Justice Kitchin ran through jurisprudence including the CJEU’s decisions in Pammer (2010), L'Oréal v eBay (2011), and Nintendo (September 2017) along with the German Supreme Court’s Parfummarken (November 2017). [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 10:54 pm
Swift v Secretary of State for Justice [2012] EWHC 2000 (QB) (18 July 2012). [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 7:21 am
Moses v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 12:22 am
Like many of this weblog's readers, this Kat has long nurtured a fascination and deep admiration for the United States Federal judiciary. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 6:55 am
This second appeal stated: The Appeal is without prejudice to the appellant’s appeal against the section 184 decision which she wants to pursue instead… The appellant has not validated the review. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:42 am
Section 23 does not refer to a requirement to provide accommodation under Part VI of the Act for the straightforward reason that there is, as Lord Justice Bean explains, no such requirement. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 4:05 pm
They claim that GCHQ has intercepted their communications in breach of the Wilson doctrine, which was thought to prohibit the agencies from eavesdropping on MPs or members of the House of Lords. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm
You just suggested what the plain text of the consent decree states unequivocally is prohibited conduct! [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 12:20 am
The provisional view of Hodge Ch communicated to the objectors stated: “[13]. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:44 am
In 1957 Lord Denning, speaking in a debate in the House of Lords on the Wolfenden Report, denounced homosexual acts as “unnatural vice” which “strikes at the integrity of the human race. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 11:45 am
Lord Templeman referred to the principle in Salomon v Salomon & co Ltd [1896] UKHL 1, as the ‘unyielding rock’ on which company law is constructed. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 5:46 am
I went back 99 years to Haas v. [read post]
