Search for: "MATTER OF D S N"
Results 3001 - 3020
of 5,778
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2012, 7:40 am
D. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
S. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 4:56 pm
The gender doesn't matter to me. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 7:48 am
” Keller Slip op. at 23, n. 1 (Inman, J., dissenting). [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 12:04 pm
ModeratorFelix Wu | Professor and Faculty Director, Cardozo Data Law Initiative, Benjamin N. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 2:42 pm
In dissent, Justice Jackson noted the “profoundly destabilizing” consequences that might follow: a “tsunami of lawsuits,” potentially brought by purpose-built “new entities,” challenging “longstanding regulations,” “[n]o matter how entrenched, heavily relied upon, or central to the functioning of our society” they might be. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 10:00 am
Dismissals for lack of subject matter jurisdiction alone are not PLRA strikes, and as it happens, there’s a circuit split about whether this kind of mixed dismissal counts as a strike. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 9:23 am
Times that similar language shows up in “[n]early 1 in 4 proposed initiatives”. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 5:25 am
Shahid N. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 6:22 am
Parallel Sessions Session 1 – Religious Pluralism and Treatment of Religious Minorities Chair: Iván C. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 5:13 pm
The landmark immigration case that discusses the standards for NIWs is Matter of New York State Department of Transportation, 22 I&N Dec. 215 (Comm.1998). [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
Sale, JD, the Walter D. [read post]
11 Jul 2009, 7:05 pm
NMCCA 200600484, slip op. at 9 (N-M. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 8:33 am
Matter of National Union Fire Ins. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 8:59 am
LEXIS 146866, at *12 (D. [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 1:41 pm
at 805, n.2 (“Both the trial court and the [F]ifth [D]istrict found the 4-year statute applicable, and we agree with the district court that the language of (3)(c), rather than (4)(a), is more specifically applicable to this case. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 6:00 pm
§ 101 rejections of software-based method claims in light of In re Bilski (FoundPersuasive) US Patents – Decisions District Court E D Texas: Computerised business method patent fails Bilski test under 35 USC 101: H&R Block Tax Services v Jackson Hewitt Tax Services Inc (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: Internet archive website is admissible evidence in touchscreen keyboard patent case: SP Techs, LLC v… [read post]
29 May 2014, 2:03 pm
§ 1.104(d)(2) and the M.P.E.P. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 10:20 am
State of Indiana, a 7-page opinion that criticizes the defendant's attorney's brief and orders him to return his fee for appellate services, Judge Friedlander writes:Ashley N. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 4:23 am
Box d. [read post]
