Search for: "MATTER OF P S" Results 3001 - 3020 of 18,876
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2023, 11:14 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
As examples of the worst cases, Eleonora cited Cofemel (C-683/17) and Brompton Bicycle (C-833/18) [see some Eleonora’s posts on the matter here and here]. [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 2:56 pm by admin
The Law Offices of David Stein specializes in complex family law matters and cases: familylawdc.com. [read post]
20 May 2016, 1:12 pm by Gene Quinn
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently announced the appointment of David P. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 1:16 pm
As the "life and health guy in a P&C shop," I get to hear some interesting anecdotes about home and auto clients, and a recent adventure is quite illuminating:Our client was cited for speeding in her '98 Mercedes. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 2:24 am by Dan Filler
And I promise you that no matter where you live, there either will or will not be precipitation tomorrow. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 5:27 pm
Nothing else is quite like it, no matter what marque you’re personally partisan to. [read post]
As for the first point, EUIPO argued that the aesthetic value of a trade mark is, as a matter of principle, irrelevant. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 6:13 am by Eugene Volokh
HBS's conduct in this matter was a breach of the black letter of its own policy, and of its contract with Plaintiff. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 10:06 am by Frank Santoro
  In Matter of Larsen, N.Y.L.J., Aug. 5, 2016, p.32 (Sur. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 1:06 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Does nonobviousness favor "flash of genius" inventions over laborious ones, despite Congress's explicit declaration that "[p]atentability shall not be negatived by the manner in which the invention was made"? [read post]
9 May 2011, 7:52 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
From p. 459:Federal law is generally interstitial in its nature. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 10:08 am by Chip Merlin
  Bob Hartwig is a tenacious and bright lobbyist for the insurance company view of how the world should work---one where consumers have few rights and judges rule for the insurance company, no matter how bad the conduct. [read post]