Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE"
Results 3001 - 3020
of 42,198
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2023, 2:45 am
A court’s review of a decision of the Commissioner of Human Rights is not whether the court would have reached the same result but was the Commissioner's determination rational in light of the evidence presented A court's review of a college’s or university’s disciplinary action against a student limited to whether it complied with its own rules in the process A public school district is not an "education corporation or… [read post]
25 May 2023, 10:40 pm
As a general matter, the Texas courts have far more permissive rules concerning standing and justiciability. [read post]
Chief Justice John Roberts and the “Privilege” of Seeing the World from Behind Fences and Barricades
25 May 2023, 9:01 pm
But, in a subtle dig, she reminded her audience that the Court’s rulings “matter in people’s lives and that shouldn’t be forgotten. [read post]
25 May 2023, 2:20 pm
That is legal, as a general rule. [read post]
25 May 2023, 1:32 pm
Due Process The stepfather also argued for reversal of the temporary and final orders because he was denied the right to be present and present evidence at trial. [read post]
25 May 2023, 10:14 am
To this end, Rule 10(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that "[e]very pleading … contain a caption setting forth the … title of the action," which must "include the names of all the parties. [read post]
25 May 2023, 8:19 am
Listen to your dad and our father who created us (God) in this matter. [read post]
25 May 2023, 7:10 am
They then filed a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(B)(1), claiming their tender of the $75,000 referenced in TQL’s stipulation mooted all of TQL’s claims for relief and deprived the court of subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
25 May 2023, 6:05 am
While appropriately highlighting some gaps in the data, the de-risking strategy uplifts this evidence and underscores the urgency of the situation. [read post]
25 May 2023, 5:31 am
The Court opined that “if aiding-and-abetting liability were taken too far, then ordinary merchants could become liable for any misuse of their goods and services, no matter how attenuated their relationship with the wrong-doer. [read post]
25 May 2023, 5:15 am
The court ruled in favor of wind farm developer and held that the PSC’s decision to grant the CECPN was neither arbitrary nor capricious and was supported by substantial evidence. [read post]
25 May 2023, 2:05 am
The Court of Appeals had affirmed the denial of those benefits by Respondents in connection with the evidence submitted on her first two applications, Matter of Salerno v Kelly, 139 AD3d 516.In support of her third attempt, Plaintiff submitted the affidavit of a retired colleague, stating that at the time of the terrorist attack, he was stationed with Plaintiff at the offices of the Internal Affairs Bureau. [read post]
25 May 2023, 2:05 am
The Court of Appeals had affirmed the denial of those benefits by Respondents in connection with the evidence submitted on her first two applications, Matter of Salerno v Kelly, 139 AD3d 516.In support of her third attempt, Plaintiff submitted the affidavit of a retired colleague, stating that at the time of the terrorist attack, he was stationed with Plaintiff at the offices of the Internal Affairs Bureau. [read post]
24 May 2023, 5:16 pm
The OCR investigation uncovered evidence that PHI for both covered entities was viewed by at least one unauthorized individual while the FTP server was open to the public. [read post]
24 May 2023, 4:16 pm
That’s because “it is the availability of a remedy that matters, not predictions of the likelihood of a win on the merits. [read post]
24 May 2023, 3:00 pm
The Article focuses on Judge Patrick's ruling requiring the City of Philadelphia to remove a plywood box covering the statute. [read post]
24 May 2023, 1:24 pm
As such, it reversed the trial court ruling. [read post]
24 May 2023, 1:18 pm
This means that no matter how substantial your family’s losses may be, your family is entitled to full compensation under Pennsylvania law. [read post]
24 May 2023, 11:02 am
Watson, 22-412Issue: Whether any amendment to a law originally adopted for an impermissible racially discriminatory purpose, no matter how minor the amendment and no matter the historical context, cleanses the law of its racist origins for 14th Amendment purposes unless the party challenging the law can prove that the amendment itself was motivated by racial discrimination. [read post]
24 May 2023, 9:45 am
I see nothing whatsoever "unfair" about it, either as a facial matter or as matter of statutory interpretation. [read post]
