Search for: "MATTER OF T H" Results 3001 - 3020 of 6,320
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2023, 11:37 am by Jason Rantanen
Hrdy, Professor of Intellectual Property Law at University of Akron School of Law, and Daniel H. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 8:28 pm
This matters because if all Congress sought to do was reference exchanges established under Section 1311, there would have been no reason to add this additional language, and the SG was able to offer no credible explanation for why this language is there. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 4:54 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
S. ___ (2019), we upheld the right of a manufacturer of jeans to register the trademark "F-U-C-T. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 1:49 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
The attorney general argued that the judge didn’t have to guess about Congress’s intent, as the Republican-led U.S. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 8:00 am by Russell Spivak
” On the other hand, Qassim asserts, nor did Hamdi grant the government “carte blanche to rely on hearsay as a matter of course. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 11:11 am by Jonathan H. Adler
They contend that state law suits about interstate emissions are barred by federal common law as a jurisdictional matter, and therefore that the District's complaint must be understood as bringing a federal common law action. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:17 am
”  It’s a thoughtful piece, but I don’t think I’m revealing a spoiler when I say I’m not convinced. [read post]
29 May 2018, 9:37 am by Benjamin Wittes
And I really don’t like it when the press celebrates the press. [read post]
21 May 2011, 2:44 am by SHG
  They just didn't give him a gift. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
As Justice Mason advised, ‘[h]umour must always be moderate, measured and appropriate to the occasion’. [read post]
19 Oct 2006, 10:16 pm
" in open court when this has nothing to do with the matter in question. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 10:32 am by Jonathan H. Adler
So one could argue (and I expect the Trump administration will argue) that whether the president is abiding by the emoluments clause is just the sort of matter that respects the nation as a whole and is not fit for judicial review. [read post]