Search for: "MUSIC v. STATE" Results 3001 - 3020 of 4,608
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2011, 8:52 pm by admin
The attorneys of the law firm of Santucci Priore, P.L. have been retained by the Defendants in the case of Fifty-Six Hope Road Music Limited v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:39 pm by Simon Gibbs
In AEI Ltd v Phonographic Performance Limited [1999] 1 WLR 1507, Lord Woolf MR stated: “…it is no longer necessary for a party to have acted unreasonably or improperly to be deprived of his costs of a particular issue on which he has failed. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 7:16 am by Walter Olson
[Hollywood Reporter] Tags: deep pocket, Indiana, music and musicians Related posts September 2000 archives, part 1 (0) Mikolajczyk v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 1:13 pm by Adam Thierer
Supreme Court’s historic First Amendment decision in Brown v. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The music website CMU has a report here. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 6:30 pm by Jeffrey Brown
The Sixth Circuit weighed in on a circuit split, finding that a ban of pornographic materials as part of a defendant's conditions of release was vague and overbroad in United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 7:23 am
70/10, Scarlet Extended SA v Société belge des auteurs, compositeurs et éditeurs SCRL (SABAM); Belgian Entertainment Association Video ASBL (BEA Video), Belgian Entertainment Association Music ASBL (BEA Music) and Internet Service Provider Association ASBL (ISPA) intervening came out at the same time as the two rulings on supplementary protection certificates for patents, which the IPKat was busily flapping over (here and… [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 4:08 am by Andres
For more than a year, those of us interested in intermediary liability have been waiting for an important Belgian case, Saban v Tiscali (now Sabam v Scarlet). [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 11:26 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Might work better if claims were confined to copyright v. patent w/r/t software? [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 6:12 am
While the importance of this distinction under U.S. law diminished after the Supreme Court decision in the "Pretty Woman" case (Campbell v Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.) in 1994 here, it still seems to occupy a more central role in the jurisprudence in other jurisdictions. [read post]