Search for: "Matter of Miller"
Results 3001 - 3020
of 4,471
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2022, 8:54 am
The statute defines “harmful to minors” material using the standard Miller test for obscenity, modified for kids (roughly following the statute upheld the Ginsburg v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:35 am
Miller v. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 1:11 pm
The first is by Greg Miller and Julie Tate, “Since Sept. 11, CIA’s focus has taken lethal turn,” September 2, 2011. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 7:29 am
In Miller v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 12:18 pm
"- Daniel Strigberger - Miller Thomson LLP"Several years experience being lead counsel in insurance litigation matters before the courts, private arbitration tribunals, and at the Financial Services Commission of Ontario. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 9:46 am
Miller Nash Graham & Dunn LLP First-Year Law Student Diversity Fellowship, Seattle, WA & Portland, OR. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 7:24 am
Miller or any of the other Liskow & Lewis real estate team members listed on our Crisis Response & Preparedness homepage. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 2:15 pm
This dedication to strong client relationships is evidenced throughout the firm’s marketing messages, but particularly in the tagline, “Kean Miller, Your Counsel. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 3:48 pm
As a preliminary but important matter, the Court held – as a matter of law – that assessing the significance of GHG impacts through a BAU analysis is a proper methodology, and does not run afoul of CEQA’s rules prohibiting use of a “hypothetical” conditions “baseline. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:08 pm
While the trial court had already resolved the petition’s allegations and granted a peremptory writ in its March 2016 decision, the December 2016 decision purportedly “denied” the petition for writ of mandate and entered “Judgment” in favor of respondents and real party “in all matters. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 1:15 pm
” Notable points and CEQA holdings from the Court’s published opinion (along with my own observations regarding some of them) include: As a general matter, “CEQA operates, not by dictating pro-environmental outcomes, but rather by mandating that “decision-makers and the public” study the likely environmental effects of contemplated government actions and thus make fully informed decisions regarding those actions. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 2:11 am
The urgency of the matter. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 10:20 am
Following that line of cases, the majority of the panel vacated the attorney fee order and remanded for a hearing on the matter where the defendant could be personally heard or for “other evidence in the record demonstrating that the defendant received notice, was aware of the opportunity to be heard on the issue, and chose not to be heard. [read post]
6 Feb 2021, 4:30 am
For the Symposium on Mary Ziegler, Abortion and the Law in America: Roe v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:50 am
That defeat did not matter to Madison now. [read post]
9 May 2013, 9:01 pm
The “Ecclesiastical Matters” Rule Barring Judicial Resolution Let us first consider the Kentucky court’s decision that it could not weigh in on Kant’s contract claims because to do so would impermissibly draw it into resolving ecclesiastical matters. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 6:32 pm
And that is what motivates us in our relationship with China and, for that matter, with any other country. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 11:52 am
In an opinion filed November 15, and later ordered published on December 14, 2021, the Sixth District Court of Appeal reaffirmed the basic CEQA principle that required environmental review and analysis must precede project approval, and it applied that principle to invalidate the California Coastal Commission’s (Commission) approval of a Coastal Development Permit (CDP) for a residential subdivision project in Monterey County. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 7:56 am
The Court upheld the trial court’s finding that the EIR violated CEQA’s requirement for a stable and finite project description as a matter of law. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 1:11 pm
In response to CBE’s arguments that CEQA compelled use of an “average” baseline, the Court stated, as a matter of logic, that: [A] baseline is simply a measure of some situation before it changes. [read post]