Search for: "NEW JERSEY v. UNITED STATES"
Results 3001 - 3020
of 3,521
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2009, 12:10 pm
The New York Court of Appeals – the state’s highest court -is about to consider an important property rights case, Goldstein v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 4:30 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 1:34 am
"
United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 11:02 pm
I just noticed that an amicus brief was filed in one of the very interesting Supreme Court cases of the new Term, Graham v. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 5:43 am
"Graham v. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 7:52 am
New Jersey. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 10:48 am
Code §§ 22.1-79, 22.1-125; compare New Jersey v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 8:33 am
The complaint alleges that Oki Data Corporation of Japan and Oki Data Americas, Inc. of Mount Laurel, New Jersey (collectively, "Oki Data") unlawfully import into the U.S., sell for importation, and sell within the U.S. after importation certain printing and imaging devices, including multifunction printers ("MFP"), and components thereof, including at least image drums and fuser units, which allegedly infringe U.S. [read post]
19 Sep 2009, 10:06 am
Not New Jersey. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 1:42 am
"
United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 5:03 am
One week later, and despite the automatic stay afforded by the bankruptcy proceeding, plaintiffs filed a class action in New Jersey state court against JEVIC and Sun Capital Partners. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 9:03 pm
One week later, and despite the automatic stay afforded by the bankruptcy proceeding, plaintiffs filed a class action in New Jersey state court against JEVIC and Sun Capital Partners. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 11:39 am
" United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 2:49 pm
Consumers Union of United States, Inc., 466 U.S. 485, 512 (1984) (citation omitted); see also Eckenrode v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 3:51 am
Furthermore, state laws may require different or additional provisions to ensure the desired result. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 6:06 am
Ed. 2d 976 (1995), that the common law knock-and-announce rule was also a "'command of the Fourth Amendment.'" Id. at 931 (quoting New Jersey v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 11:28 am
See my related prior Blog Post: State v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 3:09 pm
If the court renders a written opinion in this matter, it will be enormously influential not only in New Jersey but across the United States and even abroad. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 7:00 am
United States v. [read post]
