Search for: "People v. Case" Results 3001 - 3020 of 52,394
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2014, 11:46 am by Anonymous
I recently received a favorable decision in one of my cases, People v. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 1:12 pm by Phil Dixon
The Fourth Circuit pointed to the Gant Court’s reliance on a non-vehicle case, Chimel v. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 9:03 pm
The case was remanded for re-sentencing.In People v Sweney (2008 NY Slip Op 07393 [4th Dept]) the certificate named the wrong judge.In People v Mosley (2008 NY Slip Op 07423 [10/3/08]) the certificate incorrectly listed the consecutive sentences imposed. [read post]
9 May 2014, 12:36 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In the People v Foster 27 NY2d 47 52 [1970] the defendant challenged the admission of the speedometer deviation record into evidence to prove the reliability of the speedometer. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 2:30 am
As previously reported, last month the New York Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in People v. [read post]
1 Jun 2013, 12:38 am by Mark Tushnet
Maloy (1925), a companion case to the better-known Buck v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 4:43 pm
On July 14, 2009, the Court of Appeals published  its Per Curiam  Opinion in the consolidated matters of State of Michigan v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 6:15 pm by Brian Shiffrin
In April, 2008 the Court of Appeals in People v Sparber (10 NY3d 457 [2008]), held that only a judge, and not prison or court clerks can impose Post Release Supervision [PRS], even when sentencing courts failed to pronounce PRS as required by law. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 1:47 pm
In a 6-3 decision, the United States Supreme Court has upheld the tax credit premium assistance (subsidies) provided to individuals who live in states without a state operated health insurance exchange.The case is King v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 1:47 pm
In a 6-3 decision, the United States Supreme Court has upheld the tax credit premium assistance (subsidies) provided to individuals who live in states without a state operated health insurance exchange.The case is King v. [read post]