Search for: "People v. Price" Results 3001 - 3020 of 4,384
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
A number of people have suggested that if there was in fact a quid pro quo--the promise of a job in a second Trump administration in exchange for an endorsement--that would be illegal. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 7:26 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  For example, research shows that price signals trigger negative emotional reactions that mitigate consumers’ desires for the advertised products. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 5:39 am by Jack Goldsmith
The prices on the web of Amazon e-books, Steam-powered computer games,[6] and Staples office supplies differ based on where the user accesses their sites.[7] In these and many other ways, [g]eoblocking enhances market partitioning on the Internet by enabling content and service providers to limit access by users to information about certain goods, services, and/or prices, thereby enabling the providers to discriminate among different markets and offer different goods and services… [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 8:52 am by Eric Goldman
Once again, it’s vulnerable populations — including trafficking victims — who will pay the price. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 4:59 pm by David Kopel
Regarding conditional federal grants, in 1987 in South Dakota v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 2:46 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
These are both ways of getting people not to terminate. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 2:04 pm by Robert E. Connolly
This has resulted in a high number of foreign executives becoming defendants in price fixing cases brought by the United States. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm by Guest Author
NetChoice claims that it has an unbridled right to censor or otherwise discriminate against other peoples’ speech. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
The result will be that the price of legal services will never be made affordable to middle and lower income people as long as the present management structure of law societies prevails. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm by John Elwood
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 18-107, raises the related question of whether that prohibition includes a person’s gender identity so as to protect people from discrimination based on their transgender status. [read post]