Search for: "People v. Superior Court" Results 3001 - 3020 of 3,635
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2009, 10:08 am
 I have written before that the Supreme Court confirmation process has become, in effect, a game. [read post]
20 May 2015, 5:31 am
  Or was Lincoln right that the Constitution itself is of superior authority to the Supreme Court? [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 12:49 pm
” Merpel had just read the latest judgment of Mr Justice Arnold in the Patents Court, England and Wales, in Resolution Chemicals Limited v H Lundbeck A/S [2013] EWHC 3160 (Pat). [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The trial tested a rarely used criminal statute meant to ensure that people comply with congressional subpoenas. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 3:19 pm
Superior Court * The Asian Professional Exchange * Corporate counsel at Nordstrom's * Media outlets like the Daily Journal, Law Dragon, and Sister City * And high-level partners at Paul Hastings, Seyfarth Shaw, DLA Piper, Katten, and Bird & Marella Shouldn't a man trying to recapture the heart of a woman be less pathetic and bitchy? [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 7:36 pm by Kenneth Vercammen
Under United States Supreme Court Case, Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc., v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:20 am
Superior Court, 231 P.2d 26, 28 (Cal. 1951) ("if there had been a physician patient relationship, the privilege would be waived. . . by [plaintiff's] bringing the action for personal injuries").The Weiss court determined that, since neither the state legislature nor the state courts had seen fit to create a physician/patient privilege, it was not the job of a federal court, sitting in diversity, to change state law. 2007 WL 2137782, at *2… [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 6:23 pm by royblack
Just two months before Al-Kidd, on March 29, 2011, the Supreme Court ruled in Connick v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 12:57 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Are the higher pleasures infinitely superior and always trump any quantity of lower? [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 9:38 am by Lyle Denniston
Justice Scalia, though typically exaggerating the negative consequences of comments with which he disagreed, was probably close to correct in suggesting that lower court judges and litigating lawyers will focus on the privacy discussion the Court allowed itself to make, rather than the specific legal outcome, in City of Ontario, et al., v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 6:58 am by Joy Waltemath
Denying the employer’s motion to dismiss in its entirety, a federal district court in Illinois also determined that the three-year statute of limitations applied to her FMLA claims since she plausibly alleged willful conduct and that her Title VII claim of gender bias could also advance (Deka v. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 1:45 pm by Mark Ashton
Noting that it was applying an abuse of discretion standard, the Superior Court published decision of Judge Maryjane Bowes found that the trial court scheme was not an error. [read post]