Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF S M"
Results 3001 - 3020
of 33,784
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2014, 4:39 am
At FiveThirtyEight right now, the front page is full of things I'm not going to click through to: "Only 11 States Have Ever Elected Both a Female Governor And Senator," "How Americans Like Their Steak," "This Man Has Worked For the NBA For the League’s Entire History," "Same-Sex Couples Settle Down More Often in States That Welcome Them," "Eat More Nuts," etc. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:49 am
If a body other than the Congress of the United States were actively contemplating a step that would, by the accounts of virtually all economists, tank the U.S. economy, cause interest rates to shoot up, and trigger a financial crisis, we would talk about that body as threat to national security. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 10:36 pm
That's a state law question that could have totally different results for consumers with the same problem with the same merchant. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 3:18 pm
We’ll also be very interested in Victim 6 testimony, but that’s in a bit. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 9:30 pm
Weiden's (2006) Sorcerers' Apprentices: 100 Years of Law Clerks at the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 8:19 am
With so much going on at the FCC and in connection with other topics that we consider, I’m sometimes late getting to all of the issues that arise, and sometimes never mention some of them. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 7:17 pm
I read with interest Tobias Barrington Wolff's post about Amy Wax's many provocative statements and the resulting situation at Penn. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 4:52 pm
Dena M. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 9:29 pm
Apparently, I'm not the only one who finds the issue interesting. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 6:45 am
Freeman, and Nathaniel M. [read post]
6 May 2024, 3:00 am
Del Mese testified that federal and state authorities told the Sheriff’s Department they weren’t interested in pursuing the matter. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 4:39 pm
Executive Authority to Exclude Aliens: In Brief, Kate M. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
This News and Observer article explores the compensation of the state’s 100 sheriffs. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 1:36 am
This Kat has more than a passing interest in fashion. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:46 pm
I’m sympathetic to the idea of constitutional limits on the legislature’s ability to create strict-liability crimes, but the court’s reasoning in Shelton strikes me as something less than compelling. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 9:45 am
There's certainly conflict of interest, as his office deals with a lot of landlord-tenant issues and guess what? [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 6:33 am
I'm giving this blog another go at it. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 2:05 pm
Marc Ambinder says it's a "hidden secret[] in Washington that a Democratic Justice Department is going to be very interested in figuring out whether there's a case to be made that senior Bush Administration officials were guilty of war crimes. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
This correspondence shows a careful balancing of King’s various interests. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 9:26 am
The first scenario is probably the more accurate one, but I still think it's interesting to think about. [read post]
