Search for: "STEVEN LITTLE" Results 3001 - 3020 of 4,294
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2010, 8:09 am by Anna Christensen
At the time of his appointment, there was little reason to think that Justice Stevens’ deep methodological commitments portended much about his substantive views or relative position on the Court’s ideological spectrum. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:48 pm by Erin Miller
There was a little something for everyone this morning in the Court’s release of seven opinions (four in criminal law cases) and five cert. grants. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:11 am by Marvin Ammori
Obama and Stevens have voiced support for even the broad rationale, while the Austin majority rested only on the narrow one. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:43 am by Anna Christensen
Two obvious questions about these recent cases are how exactly they came to be, and whether they have limited presidential power too little or too much. [read post]
24 May 2010, 6:37 am by James Bickford
At Slate, two history professors evaluate Kagan’s undergraduate thesis on socialism in New York City in the early twentieth century; they conclude that the thesis leaves “little doubt that Kagan would have become a superb historian if she had wanted to be one. [read post]
23 May 2010, 2:15 pm by ZMan!
” asked Holland’s trial attorney, Steven Harris. [read post]
23 May 2010, 3:11 am by INFORRM
Australian Federal Court judge Steven Rares gave a speech on the subject of “The Jury in Defamation Trials”. [read post]
20 May 2010, 1:43 pm by Jay Rivera
  It shouldn’t be a big problem to provide a little head’s up as a courtesy to the customer- especially for companies who specialize in communications. [read post]
20 May 2010, 12:44 pm by Eugene Volokh
Stevens (“The First Amendment’s guarantee of free speech does not extend only to categories of speech that survive an ad hoc balancing of relative social costs and benefits. [read post]
19 May 2010, 10:04 pm
Bottom Line: The voting pattern provides little to no evidence for the proposition that the Court's federalism decisions are "just politics. [read post]
19 May 2010, 5:08 am by Mandelman
” From Huffington Post again… “You know, while enabling eligible homeowners to modify their mortgages is vital to addressing the housing crisis with HAMP, it’s also extremely important to keep this in context that this is just one part of the administration’s comprehensive approach to assisting homeowners and stabilizing the housing market,” said Stevens, assistant secretary for housing at the Department of Housing and Urban Development. [read post]
19 May 2010, 12:35 am by Adam Kolber
Were Minority Report unique in this respect it would have little interest, but we think this type of cheapening of ethical discourse about novel technologies is common. [read post]
18 May 2010, 5:44 pm by John Inazu
Hudnut) made it a little too quick and not quite dirty enough. [read post]
18 May 2010, 10:19 am by Anna Christensen
 Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Stevens, Ginsburg, and Sotomayor joined Justice Breyer’s opinion, while Justices Kennedy and Alito filed separate opinions concurring in the judgment. [read post]
18 May 2010, 9:10 am by Charles Kotuby
“Instead, the Department offers us little more than its own reading of the treaty’s text. [read post]
18 May 2010, 8:18 am by Steve Hall
The overall vote was 6-to-3, though that is a little misleading. [read post]
18 May 2010, 6:38 am by Marc DeGirolami
Below, Dan gives a little statement of the Graham case and some links. [read post]