Search for: "Sales v. State"
Results 3001 - 3020
of 21,151
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2021, 11:11 pm
Citing Singh v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:32 pm
” Contracting out of first sale by framing functional sales as licenses. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:54 am
Love received $4 million dollars at the time of the sale. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 7:11 am
As the recent decision in the case of Multimedia Sales & Marketing, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 2:53 pm
” The District Court in Viamedia, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 9:19 am
The Supreme Court had previously in Karlin v. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 10:55 am
Notably, in North State Deli, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 6:00 am
When is a transaction subject to the digital advertising tax “in the state”? [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 5:01 am
For instance, underenforcement may cause state expenditures to rise, while hyperenforcement may result in less sales tax revenue or require additional state services for the dependents of deported aliens. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 5:00 am
” In the 1964 landmark case of Jacobellis v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 11:29 am
For more on this point please see our previous blog post on the case of Neon Shipping Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 3:45 am
In USA Nutraceuticals Grp., the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida stated that initial interest confusion occurs when “a customer is lured to a product by the similarity of the mark, even if the customer realizes the true source of the goods before the sale is consummated. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 2:36 pm
’ Rude v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 4:40 am
So if the shotgun buy-sell rules apply, Defendant was within his rights to terminate the sale. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 9:51 am
Since 2018’s landmark South Dakota v. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 8:32 am
Joh v. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 3:07 am
Accordingly, the complaint failed to state a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice and the defendants were entitled to dismissal of that cause of action pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) (see Janker v Silver, Forrester & Lesser, P.C., 135 AD3d at 909; Benishai v Epstein, 116 AD3d at 728). [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 1:25 am
Otherwise, they would be facing administrative or criminal proceedings under the laws of each Member State. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 1:49 pm
Supreme Court issued its decision yesterday in Federal Republic of Germany v. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 7:59 am
Archer & White Sales, Inc. v. [read post]
