Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 3001 - 3020
of 13,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2010, 2:44 pm
United States District Court Judge Marilyn Hall Patel (Northern District of California) offered some interesting comments, but no clear solutions, to the puzzle posed by litigation of PAGA claims as representative actions. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 11:04 am
United States Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 10:52 pm
United States District Court Judge Thelton E. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 11:41 pm
California and related decisions. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 6:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:30 pm
Olguin in the United States District Court in the Central District of California, ruled otherwise. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 1:07 pm
Chamber of Commerce of the USA et al v. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 1:07 pm
Chamber of Commerce of the USA et al v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 1:45 pm
These cards may fall under the List B document described as: “A driver’s license or identification card containing a photograph, issued by a state . . . or outlying possession of the United States. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 6:34 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 7:15 pm
Did you know that at any given moment, up to 2.3 million citizens are confined in our prisons in the United States? [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 7:30 pm
Three more amicus briefs have been filed in Winter v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 8:28 pm
United States [U.S. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 9:04 am
In a similar vein, we are thankful for the helpful briefing and argument we received from the United States as amicus curiae. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 8:39 pm
(Schofield v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 2:46 pm
” The Plaintiffs in Opperman v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
Republicans’ refusal to pass budgets almost destroyed the California state government, at one point even preventing the state from issuing checks and requiring that temporary IOU vouchers be substituted to pay state employees and contractors. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 12:20 pm
After the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
Sept. 21, 2017), the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filed a complaint against Justin Samuel Cary (“Cary”) in the United States District Court for the Central District of California for alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act Section 10(b) (“§ 10b”) and Rules 10b-5(a) and 10b-5(c) promulgated thereunder. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:14 am
First, the Court evaluated whether the de minimis doctrine is still good law in light of the United States Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Sandifer v. [read post]
