Search for: "State v Smith"
Results 3001 - 3020
of 11,003
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2012, 10:39 pm
” Smith v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
Article V, §6, in pertinent part, requires that “Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive…. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
Article V, §6, in pertinent part, requires that “Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive…. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 8:47 am
KAMMERER, JR. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 2:35 pm
Today, Jeff regales us with his take on Stern v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 12:10 pm
., LLC v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 12:03 pm
Smith, 186 N.C. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 3:20 pm
(See Tri-State Coach Corp. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 2:18 am
US v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 11:51 am
1) The House of Representatives passed H.R. 1249 (aka the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act) by a voice vote of 304 to 117. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 3:03 pm
Scott Smith has this story in the Stockton Record.The Ninth Circuit today rejected the attack on Arizona's lethal injection protocol in Dickens v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 4:05 am
In Smith v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 8:00 am
Yesterday, the state of Nevada filed an amicus brief I coauthored on behalf of the state of Nevada, and eight other state governments in Murr v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 9:36 am
In Smith v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:51 am
Smith Is blight, like beauty, in the eye of the beholder? [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 6:00 am
Smith, 2016 U.S. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 8:23 pm
Not until counsel has been “repeatedly unconscious through not insubstantial portions” of even capital murder trials will prejudice to the defendant will be presumed (see, Muniz v Smith, 647 F3d 619 [6th Cir 2011]; Burdine v Johnson, 262 F3d 336, 340-41 [5th Cir 2001]; Tippins v Walker, 77 F3d 682, 685 [2nd Cir 1996]). [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 2:26 pm
Smith largely repudiated the method of analysis used in prior free exercise cases like Wisconsin v. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 10:06 am
Harassment investigation delay It is also important to note that the court distinguished a previous case denying summary judgment (Smith v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 11:24 am
United States v. [read post]
