Search for: "State v. Dominic"
Results 3001 - 3020
of 4,510
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2012, 3:53 pm
Hund went on to argue for the same interpretation of Jones v. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 7:05 pm
After discussing the data source for this paper, I then describe the amounts and trends in U.S. settlements in private antitrust suits since 1990, the dominance of U.S. cases in the world, the extent to which private suits follow government investigations, and the severity of private recoveries relative to affected sales and to damages caused by the cartels. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 11:13 am
Some state unfair competition statutes have been interpreted more broadly to outlaw “immoral, unethical, oppressive or unscrupulous” business practices. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 1:43 pm
A colleague of mine, whose views on this topic differ, suggested in a debate recently that United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 9:32 am
In North Carolina, state recognition of governmental immunity dates back more than a century to Moffitt v. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 7:29 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 6:47 am
Plaintiffs needed to point to specific acts of control or domination to state a valid claim. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 12:24 pm
Even if they are correct, the parties pressing for government antitrust action against Google cannot claim the courts have ever recognized the concept of natural monopoly as a surrogate for the United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 3:04 pm
The United States Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has a little-known viz. little-cited report titled The Evolving IP Martketplace: Aligning Patent Notice and Remedies with Competition which it issued already clear back in March 2011, but whose content is particularly relevant now in an American and world intellectual property scene dominated by monopolists, patent trolls, patent wars and a recalcitrant Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ("CAFC"): The FTC report… [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 9:01 am
Jim Chen, Merger to Monopsony: AT&T, T-Mobile, and the Clayton Act, downloadable at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2130962: In a pivotal antitrust decision, Cellular South, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 9:01 am
Jim Chen, Merger to Monopsony: AT&T, T-Mobile, and the Clayton Act, downloadable at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2130962: In a pivotal antitrust decision, Cellular South, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 5:39 pm
Supreme Court's 1964 decision in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 4:36 pm
The court will revisit the issue Oct. 10, when it is scheduled to hear oral arguments in Fisher v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 12:32 pm
Supreme Court decided by 6-3 in Timmons v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 4:25 am
One of the cases involves Comcast and its domination of the market in the Philadelphia area. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 5:58 am
Housing Authority v. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 7:02 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 6:51 am
In Carlin v. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 4:20 pm
Plessy v Ferguson in 1896 held that despite the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment, a state law requiring separate railroad cars for blacks and whites was constitutional as long as the cars were physically the same. [read post]
16 Sep 2012, 5:14 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
