Search for: "State v. Downs"
Results 3001 - 3020
of 40,832
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2017, 2:15 am
BREAKING NEWS: United States of America v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 2:21 am
Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2022, 4:35 pm
In Lions Club of Albany, California v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
This problem of distrust drives down rates of re-election and thereby generates an incentive for representatives to resolve it. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 1:09 pm
On Monday, the Supreme Court in Arizona v. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 9:08 am
The Supreme Court eventually struck down the New York law in Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 6:27 am
Rogers v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 1:57 am
Co. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:22 am
Chinese companies, backed with every advantage the state can provide, must venture out into the world to lock down long-term access to the crude oil, natural gas, metals, minerals, and other commodities needed to fuel a still-vulnerable developing economy. . . . [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 6:33 pm
Combined with Rescuecom giving up, Google has now whittled its pending AdWords challenges down to 8 pending cases. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Evans v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 7:51 pm
Yesterday, the Supreme Court handed down Fernandez v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 5:25 am
This is Congress' response to United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 5:25 am
This is Congress' response to United States v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 11:13 pm
After the recent 5-4 SCOTUS ruling in Brown v. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 4:40 pm
On 17 May 2019, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Serafin v Malkiewicz & Ors ([2019] EWCA Civ 852). [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 12:27 pm
Supreme Court’s 2003 decision in Lawrence and Garner v. [read post]
5 Jul 2014, 10:06 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 9:07 am
The IPKat has had his attention directed to the decision in Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp v Teva UK Ltd, [2011] EWCA Civ 382, a ruling of the Court of Appeal for England and Wales (Sir Andrew Morrit, The Chancellor of the High Court, providing a judgment with which Richards and Patten LJJ agreed) handed down yesterday.To summarise: Teva had applied for revocation of Merck’s European Patent (EP(UK) 0509752), relating to “ophthalmic compositions comprising combinations of… [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 7:27 am
Holder, in which the Court struck down Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act, which established the formula used to determine which state and local governments are required to comply with the Act’s “preclearance” requirement. [read post]