Search for: "State v. Square" Results 3001 - 3020 of 5,946
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2023, 2:44 am by Matrix Law
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March… [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:16 am by Gary L. Francione
Pacelle also states: Our board of directors is a national volunteer board of directors. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 12:17 am
This is my third and final post on  Engquist v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 3:03 am by SHG
By most accounts, oral argument in Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 2:17 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 03/03/23) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter, heard 14th June 2022 R (on the application of… [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 1:59 am by Matrix Law
R (on the application of VIP Communications Ltd (In Liquidation)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 4th October 2022 McCue v Glasgow City Council, heard 18th October 2022 Unger and another (in substitution for Hasan) v Ul-Hasan (deceased) and another, heard 20th October 2022 In the matter of an application by Rosaleen Dalton for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 26th October 2022. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 11:55 am
Stone wrote in the wake of Gonzales v. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 12:16 pm by Eugene Volokh
Plaintiffs have clearly stated a claim that falls squarely within this right: that Defendants removed the books at issue to prevent access to viewpoints and content to which they objected…. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 4:18 am by SHG
Historically, it is an accurate description of public square free speech issues in the United States from the 1950’s until today. [read post]