Search for: "Taylor v. Taylor" Results 3001 - 3020 of 4,755
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2011, 7:50 am by Ilya Somin
(Ilya Somin) Virginia was one of several states that enacted a strong eminent domain reform law after the Supreme Court ruled in Kelo v. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 12:23 am
Summer, from James Thomson's The Seasons The fifth item in the little bundle of photocopied articles on IP history which this Kat researched and wrote back in the 1980s, when he was still a full-time academic, takes a look at two cases which, though never read by copyright lawyers today, can be found surprising often on students' reading lists (no -- most students don't read them either): the twin peaks of 18th copyright case law in England, Millar v Taylor and… [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:17 am by Lawrence Douglas
Telford Taylor, the chief NMT prosecutor, came to think of the trial program as a failure. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 12:06 pm by Brian Thompson
  Prior to O’Neil this legal issue had been addressed by the California Court of Appeal, most notably in Taylor v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 8:10 am by admin
by Sarah Taylor, SpringerLyle ••• In June of 2011, the United States Supreme Court decided an important issue regarding the warning labels on prescription drugs in Pliva, Inc. et al v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:48 am by INFORRM
Murdoch’s evidence (uncorrected transcript PDF here) provided plenty of material for comment and analysis: Paul Farrelly MP probed him on the Gordon Taylor case; Watson revealed the details of his conversation with former chief reporter Neville Thurlbeck; and Philip Davies MP questioned Murdoch’s management decisions. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 5:33 am by INFORRM
  This point was considered in the case of Howlett v Holding ([2006] EWHC 41 (QB)). [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 2:12 pm by A. Brian Albritton
Attorney for the Southern District of New York filed an amended complaint against Allied Home Mortgage and two of its executives:  US ex rel Belli v. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
Although protection of privacy in Australian law has evolved considerably since the stance taken in Victoria Park Racing and Recreation Grounds Co Ltd v Taylor that “any person is entitled to look over the plaintiff’s fence to see what goes on in the plaintiff’s land. [read post]