Search for: "The United States, Petitioner"
Results 3001 - 3020
of 8,957
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2018, 1:58 pm
As defense counsel to United States citizens abroad, I used to be able to successfully argue that the foreign government had detained my clients for days and weeks without filing charges and/or affording them right to counsel, consular access, etc. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 1:58 pm
As defense counsel to United States citizens abroad, I used to be able to successfully argue that the foreign government had detained my clients for days and weeks without filing charges and/or affording them right to counsel, consular access, etc. [read post]
13 Jan 2018, 5:52 am
§ 271(f), it is an act of patent infringement to supply “components of a patented invention,” “from the United States,” knowing or intending that the components be combined “outside of the United States,” in a manner that “would infringe the patent if such combination occurred within the United States. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 12:54 pm
United States: Whether road culverts that reduce fish habitat in Washington state violate Native American fishing rights guaranteed by treaty. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 12:00 am
Our client has a Master’s degree in Business Administration (MBA) in the United States and work experience. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 7:05 am
United States 16-1519 Issue: Whether 18 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 2:17 pm
United States, 16-1519 Issue: Whether 18 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 6:35 pm
” Arguing on behalf of the United States, Eric Feigin offered another bright-line rule – this time, one that would resolve the case in the government’s favor. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 11:22 am
This post follows up on my prior blog post regarding the case pending at the United States Supreme Court involving the question of when a copyright holder can properly file a copyright infringement lawsuit. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 7:11 pm
If the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) exceeds its statutory authority by instituting an IPR proceeding under circumstances contrary to the language of § 315(b), our court, sitting in its proper role as an appellate court, should review those determinations. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 7:00 am
United States. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:56 am
” The Government of the United Kingdom identified the emblem as “[t]he official emblem of the Prince of Wales” when it notified WIPO in 2005, under the Paris Convention, that this emblem is a ‘state emblem’ of the United Kingdom. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 12:41 am
Full Faith and Credit of the United States Constitution requires Texas to accept any other state’s order, but it does not require that it accept the legal documents of another state, limiting the reach of a Texas adoption lawyer. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 12:41 am
Full Faith and Credit of the United States Constitution requires Texas to accept any other state’s order, but it does not require that it accept the legal documents of another state, limiting the reach of a Texas adoption lawyer. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 1:43 pm
J[ay] Blackledge was born in the Ukraine in 2008 but is a United States citizen. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 4:33 am
United States, in which the justices will consider next week whether a driver has a reasonable expectation of privacy in a rental car when he is not listed as an authorized driver on the rental contract. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 9:58 pm
CASE: I-485 Adjustment of Status / I-140 (EB-2 Category) / Schedule A EMPLOYER: Nursing Care Facility BENEFICIARY: Filipina LOCATION: Houston, TX Our client is in the United States with an H-1B visa and has been working as a nurse instructor. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 10:26 am
After all, doesn’t BAHA’s § 1(e) define “workers in the United States” and “United States workers” as described in 8 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 10:26 am
After all, doesn’t BAHA’s § 1(e) define “workers in the United States” and “United States workers” as described in 8 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
