Search for: "US v. Smith"
Results 3001 - 3020
of 8,540
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2021, 2:20 pm
State v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 2:38 am
State v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 2:02 pm
Bar v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 1:44 am
* Bayer feels the pain: branded Naproxen can't invoke the territoriality principleKatfriend Marty Schwimmer reports on Belmora LLC v Bayer Consumer Care AG and Bayer Healthcare LLC, 1:14-cv-00847-GBL (EDVA Feb. 6, 2015), a recent US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia ruling that deals with Article 6bis of the Paris Convention in the US as it applies to Bayer’s trade mark ‘FLANAX’. [read post]
22 Jan 2025, 6:38 am
State v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 8:03 am
Holder Smith v. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 6:55 am
Smith, 251 Ga. 1, 2 (2) (302 SE2d 542) (1983); Johnson v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 1:09 pm
Smith, by reading reviews on Google, Yelp and AVVO. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 3:00 am
Last week, in Digital Realty Trust v. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 5:45 am
The real takeaway from Pruett v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:59 am
Robinson, 414 US 218 (1973) and clothing (United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
"Pursuant to the Retirement and Social Security Law, the salary base used to compute retirement benefits shall not include . . . compensation paid in anticipation of retirement" (Matter of Franks v DiNapoli, 53 AD3d 897, 898 [3d Dept 2008] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Retirement and Social Security Law § 431 [3]; Matter of Smith v DiNapoli, 167 AD3d 1208, 1209-1210 [3d Dept 2018]). [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
"Pursuant to the Retirement and Social Security Law, the salary base used to compute retirement benefits shall not include . . . compensation paid in anticipation of retirement" (Matter of Franks v DiNapoli, 53 AD3d 897, 898 [3d Dept 2008] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Retirement and Social Security Law § 431 [3]; Matter of Smith v DiNapoli, 167 AD3d 1208, 1209-1210 [3d Dept 2018]). [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 10:51 am
Smith, Ikuta, Nguyen, Watford, Hurwitz, Miller, Bade and Bress. [read post]
19 May 2015, 4:09 pm
A case such as Smith v Trafford Housing Trust is less clear cut. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 2:41 pm
That was not the case in U.S. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 12:21 am
In the new case, United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 5:50 pm
See Brandt v. [read post]
