Search for: "United States v. Holder"
Results 3001 - 3020
of 4,280
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2022, 6:07 am
In Rodriguez v. [read post]
23 Feb 2013, 11:45 am
By virtue of having followed the Microsoft v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 3:26 pm
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/10/29/10-99021o.pdf United State v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 3:39 am
Someone wrote on Twitter that patent holders had something to celebrate yesterday: After the Supreme Court's Oil States (7-2 confirming constitutionality of PTAB inter partes review) and SAS (5-4 holding that PTAB must render decision on all challenged patent claims after granting review), patent holders were allegedly in a stronger position than before, which--as the same tweeter (I forgot the name) noted--is rarely the case when the Supreme Court overrules the… [read post]
26 May 2008, 8:06 pm
The Court does note a series of decisions which run counter to the reasoning in United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 2:40 am
” However, when the Respondent registered the domain name the Complainant had no trademark in any country; and, in the United States it had abandoned its application in “the face of … a preliminary refusal of the application on the ground that the mark was descriptive. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:30 am
As the Supreme Court held in State Farm v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 2:36 pm
The Supreme Court held in Holder v Humanitarian Law Project that one can be convicted of a crime for violating 18 U. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 8:51 am
(See, e.g., Kaiser Aetna v. [read post]
Patent office and Qualcomm's litigation tactics render prof's fanboy testimony on patents unreliable
23 Jan 2019, 8:08 am
The combination of two Apple v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 2:43 pm
In recent years, we’ve … said … that a statute does not apply outside the United States unless it says that it applies outside the United States. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 6:00 am
Citing Scott v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 6:03 pm
Holder. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 12:12 pm
However, In their 2016 article, Hemel & Ouellette explain that the opposite rule would be the one more likely to “lower prices of patented goods in the United States and raise prices abroad. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 11:31 am
That changed on October 26, 2006, when the Florida Supreme Court ruled in State v. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 4:31 pm
Consequently, the Court affirmed the suppression order.State v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 4:41 pm
With nearly half of the country now living in states which have legalized marijuana at least for medical purposes, it is no longer accurate to state that there is “no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States” — if this was ever true to begin with. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 4:41 pm
With nearly half of the country now living in states which have legalized marijuana at least for medical purposes, it is no longer accurate to state that there is “no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States” — if this was ever true to begin with. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 2:55 am
For a detailed overview of Ruscoe v Cryptopia,please refer to our previous publication: Cryptocurrencies are property capable of being held on trust, New Zealand High Court holds The Hon Madam Justice Linda Chan noted that “the preponderance of jurisprudence recognises the proprietary nature of cryptocurrencies” and included case law on cryptocurrencies being considered as “property” (or similar definition) in various jurisdictions including England and Wales, the… [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:14 am
United States Inc. v. [read post]
