Search for: "United States v. Washington" Results 3001 - 3020 of 9,057
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2022, 9:23 am by Eugene Volokh
Unlike the state supreme court decision in Rickert v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 11:09 am by Jack Chin
United States (U.S. 2013) cited it and two other scholarly articles to show that the historical evidence contradicted Apprendi v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether a guilty plea waives a challenge to the constitutionality of an offense. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 8:25 am by Amy Howe
United States and the treaty power. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 4:25 pm by Orin Kerr
Justices Breyer and Ginsburg are pretty obvious votes for the mandate, as they dissented in United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
Lucero; Eugene Volokh] “Innocent man spent months in jail for bringing honey back to United States” [Lynn Bui, Washington Post/MSN] Preakness, Peter Pan Inn, relocating USDA jobs, Baltimore and Abell Foundation in my new Free State Notes roundup; Pushing back against the argument, much circulated lately, that eviction is a major factor in causing poverty [John Eric Humphries, Nicholas Mader, Daniel Tannenbaum, Winnie van Dijk, Cowles Foundation]… [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 6:32 am by Robin Craig
Notably, both sets of amici — the United States and three water law professors — agreed with the defendants. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
The United States also expands on its argument regarding why the Ninth Circuit erred in the decision below. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 8:18 am by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
Washington, concerns state court claims under section 1983; a live-stream of oral argument audio will be provided on the Court’s website. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 1:20 pm by Bruce E. Boyden
Indeed, it is a bit difficult to explain why, exactly, password guessing leads to unauthorized access — the Fifth Circuit was forced to explain that seemingly obvious conclusion in United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 6:38 pm
§ 2254, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana. [read post]