Search for: "Welling v. Welling" Results 3001 - 3020 of 110,244
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2018, 9:38 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Eric previously blogged about another The Cobbler enforcement suit that didn’t turn out well for the plaintiff. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 4:38 am by SHG
Two cases whose names may well be connected to one of the most important rulings the Supreme Court will make in our lifetime are United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 2:21 pm by Anna Christensen
Stevens, in which the Court handed down its opinion on Tuesday, now includes a link to the ruling, as well as analysis by SCOTUSblog’s Lyle Denniston. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 4:16 am
Andrew Jackson called them "Miss Nancy" and "Aunt Fancy" (the former being a 19th-century euphemism for an effeminate man), while Aaron V. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 12:28 pm
If you're an insurance company who's just been spanked at trial for $10 million in punitive damages, as well an additional half a million dollars in the other side's attorney's fees, because you (allegedly) illegally denied plaintiff's disability insurance claim, it's gotta bring at least a slight smile to your face to find out that your panel in the Ninth Circuit consists of Judges Hall, O'Scannlain, and Ikuta.Punitive damage and fee award reversed. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 11:14 am
This morning the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Free Enterprise Fund and Beckstead and Watts, LLP v. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 11:08 am
Applying the Supreme Court's 1990 decision in Employment Division v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 11:22 am
And Judge Noonan sometimes sees things, well, let's just say, in pretty stark terms. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 11:22 am
And the petition for rehearing -- after an extension, no less -- was due way back then as well. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 11:16 am
Currently at the annual conference on eminent domain law - as always, well worth attending.In the morning's session, Professor Kanner mentioned the recent decision in County of Hawaii v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Unknown
Among other things, the amendments would increase the portfolio requirement monetary thresholds in Regulation 4.7(a)(1)(v) to account for the effects of inflation over the last 30 years, and would create new minimum disclosure requirements for CPOs and CTAs operating pools and trading programs under the regulation.The Commission said that it wants to modernize Regulation 4.7 given that it is by far the most popular registration status for CPOs and CTAs. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 5:16 pm by crush
If Congress wanted to prevent this, is the Supreme Court well-positioned to say that Congress was wrong? [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 7:44 pm
Here is the abstract:Hoffman v. [read post]