Search for: "24 LLC" Results 3021 - 3040 of 6,803
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2017, 7:05 am by Cannabis Law Group
The LLC is represented to the bank as a property management firm, and the bank “doesn’t know what we do”. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 6:30 am by Michael B. Stack
  Timely Investigations — All accidents should be investigated within 24 hours. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 4:49 am by SHG
” Be Nice wrote on September 09, 2006 1:24 PM: “Okay so a Judge made a bad Judgement in turning. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am by Wolfgang Demino
., LLC, 837 F.3d 918, 932 (8th Cir. 2016) (finding viable FDCPA claims based on amounts "misstated by $1.29, $1.84, and $0.65" because "there [i]s no de minimis exception to FDCPA liability based upon low dollar amounts").[4]FULL TEXT OF DISSENTING OPINION  STEPHEN A. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 2:38 pm by Edward Smith
iPhone Glitter Cases Recalled After Reports of Chemical Burns I’m Ed Smith, a Sacramento personal injury lawyer. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 6:20 am
Bacardi , Serial Nos. 86809072 and 86809084 [Section 2(d) refusal of THIRTEEN 30  and 1330 for "Clothing, namely, dresses, skirts, blouses, shirts, pants, and jackets," in view of the registered mark LOGAN 1330 for various clothing items].August 24, 2017 - 1 PM: In re ACM Records, Inc., Serial No. 86563789. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 2:34 pm by Adam Gana
(April 2003 – December 2003) • Maxim Group LLC (October 2003 – December 2004) • Investec Ernst & Company (September 2002 – October 2002) • Kirlin Securities Inc. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 12:38 pm by Ron Coleman
Major kudos to @RonColeman + @brucegodfrey for pro bono work https://t.co/afqZmvYOWN — BeleaguredPopehat (@Popehat) July 24, 2017 I don’t have to explain why it’s important that the courts not let themselves become instruments to silence commentary on issues of public significance, or to enforce the whims of serial “lawfare” litigators. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 10:24 am
The BTA rejected using the sale price to value the land because the sale occurred more than 24 months before the January 1, 2011 update valuation, and thus was not a “recent”, arm’s length sale according to the BTA. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 10:24 am
The BTA rejected using the sale price to value the land because the sale occurred more than 24 months before the January 1, 2011 update valuation, and thus was not a “recent”, arm’s length sale according to the BTA. [read post]