Search for: "ALL POTENTIAL CLAIMANTS"
Results 3021 - 3040
of 4,874
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2014, 4:13 pm
Standard practice in the MET is that the DPS should be informed of any intelligence that the security of a ‘protected person’ for their immediate attention: “Investigating officers should contact the Directorate of Professional Standards (DPS) in all cases where protection measures have the potential to be frustrated because of the existence or suspicion of corruption within a Law Enforcement or Government Agency. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 3:31 am
The claimants argued that this practice amounts to infringement as it is not clear to the clients that they are being directed to a site hosting content in another website, while the defendants claimed that ttheir clients knew that the content was hosted elsewhere. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 6:22 am
The claimants appealed. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 3:07 pm
Now it's time to tell you all about the trial of the substantive issue -- and here to tell it is Cerryg Jones (head of Brands & Designs at Wragge & Co LLP, which acted for the successful claimant. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 5:25 pm
Two circuit court cases assert that claimants have to use section 44 of the Lanham Act as a vehicle to assert rights. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 3:03 pm
Other assignments are dated very recently and obviously open to potential challenge by the Liquidator. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 3:03 pm
Other assignments are dated very recently and obviously open to potential challenge by the Liquidator. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 7:33 am
The Court concluded that the sums that were awarded could more fairly be described as damages owed to the claimants, and not as disgorgement of ill-gotten gains, and were therefore covered. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 4:12 am
Instead, in an omissions case, the claimant simply does not have to establish reliance. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 4:53 pm
Thus, this Court concurs with the OATH decision's conclusion that a judge's "hands should not be tied" by the literal language of these framed issues when addressing a claimant's due process concerns. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 2:50 pm
The court here found that Clapper didn’t impose a new requirement, just rejected “a speculative chain of possibilities based on potential future surveillance. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 2:41 pm
And in any event, even those tools need to be invoked in only a tiny fraction of all cases. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 1:27 pm
If this decision was correct, then it would be entirely possible for a Council to exclude any and all homeless applicants, whatever duty was owed, from the Part 6 housing allocation list. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 1:27 pm
If this decision was correct, then it would be entirely possible for a Council to exclude any and all homeless applicants, whatever duty was owed, from the Part 6 housing allocation list. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 2:37 pm
I also emphasized that only about 10% of all injured workers need a lawyer. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 12:20 pm
All three types are open to inspection and attack by the TA. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 9:01 am
In summary, the doctrine of laches is an equitable defence that, when asserted, prevents a claimant from commencing litigation after an unreasonable delay such that to bring litigation would prejudice the defendant. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 7:24 am
The claimant got the two bed rate of LHA, but was still technically a bedroom over. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 7:24 am
The claimant got the two bed rate of LHA, but was still technically a bedroom over. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 6:41 am
In refusing to provide a direct cause of action for third party claimants, the legislature may well have been aware of this potential for conflicting duties. [read post]
