Search for: "Anthony v State"
Results 3021 - 3040
of 5,085
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2019, 9:43 am
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 1:12 am
Circuit's ruling in FTC v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 6:37 pm
How does the UK use its own hybrid tools to influence both States and Non-State actors? [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
“Far from seeking to devalue marriage,” Justice Anthony Kennedy responded for the majority in Obergefell v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 8:35 am
Hurst v. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 2:58 pm
L v. [read post]
14 May 2008, 8:40 am
Moore v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 9:38 pm
In the case of condemned killer Michael Anthony Archuleta, a unanimous court said low pay and the complexity of such cases have shrunk the pool of Utah attorneys who will accept them. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 11:14 am
The majority in Arizona v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 8:31 am
The two-year-old ruling, District of Columbia v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 1:21 pm
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 7:08 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 4:04 am
Missed last week, but leading off this edition, is Phillip Anthony Summers v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 8:40 am
James, JudgeRepresenting Appellant (Plaintiff): V. [read post]
3 Jul 2022, 1:36 pm
In Roe v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 9:17 am
The case of Harris v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 7:44 am
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Mastercard Incorporated & Ors v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE, heard 13 and 14 May 2019 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 In the matter of an application… [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:42 pm
In Benisek v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 11:43 am
The case was closely watched by states, civil rights groups and others because it was filed shortly after the Supreme Court raised doubts about Section 5’s constitutionality in its 2009 ruling in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. [read post]
