Search for: "Antonin Scalia" Results 3021 - 3040 of 6,601
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2011, 8:03 am
Justice Antonin Scalia delivered the opinion of the Court in Brown v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 4:59 am by Amy Howe
” Headnotes, the online forum of The University of Minnesota Law Review, hosts a symposium on Justice Antonin Scalia’s impact on the Court. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 7:30 am by Dan Ernst
First-generation originalists like Antonin Scalia, Robert Bork, and Lino Graglia defend originalism in part by pointing to the negative political and social consequences of any alternative approach. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 7:05 am by Amy Howe
In The National Law Journal (subscription or registration required), Tony Mauro reports that, although the chambers of the late Justice Antonin Scalia have not yet been shut down, “one aspect of Scalia’s legacy is moving forward: the vigorous debate among legal scholars and former clerks about the justice’s impact and importance on the court. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm by Christine Dowling
"Justice Alito:  "For many years the more senior members of the Supreme Court, Justice [John Paul] Stevens before he retired, Justice [Antonin] Scalia, stopped the practice of attending State of the Union addresses because they have become very political events and very awkward for the justices. . . [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:52 am by Marcia Coyle
" After Kennedy summarized the decision from the bench this morning, Justice Antonin Scalia delivered a lengthy summary of his dissent in which he used as evidence of the majority's error the Obama Administration's recent decision to allow the children of illegal aliens to remain temporarily in this country. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 3:05 pm
And: Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia said in 2006 that he didn’t believe the United States had executed anyone who was innocent. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:31 pm by Ashby Jones
According to the Post: The letter, to the House and Senate Judiciary committees, comes after recent controversies involving travel and appearances at political events by several Supreme Court justices, including Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:23 am by Josh Blackman
(He did not sign Justice Antonin Scalia’s forcefully libertarian majority opinion.) [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 1:01 pm by Amy Howe
Less than three years ago, after the death of Justice Antonin Scalia, the court – by a vote of 5-3 – struck down a similar law from Texas. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 12:22 pm by Ashby Jones
Justice Antonin Scalia questioned whether it made sense for a school to tell a student group who it could (and couldn’t) include. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 8:44 pm by Glenn Reynolds
., on Saturday endorsed Common Cause’s personal attack on Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. . . . [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 7:52 pm
"Berry's case is pending before Justice Antonin Scalia. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 8:56 am
The WSJ likewise frets that a Court majority "seemed uncomfortable with barring employees from suing" and that justices who expressed concerns similar to Justice Breyer's included not only Justice Ginsburg but also Justices David Souter, Antonin Scalia, and Samuel Alito. [read post]
13 Nov 2006, 8:59 am
Alito, Jr., Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 9:51 am by Sam Skolnik
For a full hour, Solicitor General Donald Verrilli Jr. fielded tough and sometimes hostile questions from Justices Antonin Scalia, Samuel Alito Jr. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 3:35 am by Amy Howe
   Briefly: Commentary related to the death of Justice Antonin Scalia and the nomination of Chief Judge Merrick Garland to succeed him comes from Steven Mazie, who in The Economist argues that, “[w]hile the GOP stands guard over the fortress it has erected around Mr Scalia’s empty seat, the eight justices Mr Garland hopes to join are struggling to finish a term dotted with vexed and closely divided cases. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 1:52 pm by David Kravets
Justice Antonin Scalia, in a concurring opinion joined by Justice Clarence Thomas, said there was no constitutional right to informational privacy — a premise “consistent with constitutional text and tradition. [read post]