Search for: "B. R."
Results 3021 - 3040
of 55,756
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2021, 7:15 am
Jens Adolphsen, Lehrstuhl für Bürgerliches Recht, Nationales und Internationales Zivilverfahrensrecht und Sportrecht€ 199 Patents as an Incentive for Innovation by Rafal Sikorski, Zaneta Zemla-Pacud€ 136 [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 4:45 pm
R. 1187 and four Democratic members voted against it. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 11:41 am
One of the assessments further included two 1991 LDNR compliance orders to Stone Petroleum, requiring the closure of two pits and finding that the pits were not in compliance with Statewide Order 29-B because they were full and had overflowed in the past. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 11:41 am
One of the assessments further included two 1991 LDNR compliance orders to Stone Petroleum, requiring the closure of two pits and finding that the pits were not in compliance with Statewide Order 29-B because they were full and had overflowed in the past. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 11:41 am
One of the assessments further included two 1991 LDNR compliance orders to Stone Petroleum, requiring the closure of two pits and finding that the pits were not in compliance with Statewide Order 29-B because they were full and had overflowed in the past. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 10:34 am
Jens Adolphsen, Lehrstuhl für Bürgerliches Recht, Nationales und Internationales Zivilverfahrensrecht und Sportrecht€ 199 Patents as an Incentive for Innovation by Rafal Sikorski, Zaneta Zemla-Pacud€ 136 [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 3:27 am
The claimant also argued that the indemnity falls within the provisions of sections 48(2)(a) and (b) of the Consumer Protection Act (CPA) and its terms were unfair, unreasonable or unjust and that the defendant had not complied with sections 49(2) and 58(1) of the CPA>. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 8:26 am
Limits on effect of registered trade mark. 30(1) – “Nothing in Section 29 shall be construed as preventing the use of a registered trademark by any person for the purposes of identifying goods or services as those of the proprietor provided the use — (b) is not such as to take unfair advantage of or be detrimental to the distinctive character or repute of the trademark. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 7:35 am
Jens Adolphsen, Lehrstuhl für Bürgerliches Recht, Nationales und Internationales Zivilverfahrensrecht und Sportrecht€ 199 Patents as an Incentive for Innovation by Rafal Sikorski, Zaneta Zemla-Pacud€ 136 [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 1:09 am
Jens Adolphsen, Lehrstuhl für Bürgerliches Recht, Nationales und Internationales Zivilverfahrensrecht und Sportrecht€ 199 Patents as an Incentive for Innovation by Rafal Sikorski, Zaneta Zemla-Pacud€ 136 [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 1:00 am
On Wednesday 23 and Thursday 24 June, the Supreme Court will hear the conjoined cases of R (on the application of O (a minor, by her litigation friend AO)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of The Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) (Expedited). [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 12:23 am
Por otra parte, si bien es cierto que, como señala la Comisión, la demandante declaró, en su impreso de candidatura, que disponía de un nivel de francés equivalente al nivel C2 del MCER, al igual que el portugués, y que había realizado una parte de sus estudios en Bélgica y en Francia, no es menos cierto que afirma ante el Tribunal, sin que la Comisión la contradiga al respecto, dominar mejor su lengua materna que el… [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 12:04 am
Let’s take a look and see what the act says about it: (2) A tenancy or licence is excluded if— (a) under its terms the occupier shares any accommodation with the landlord or licensor; and(b) immediately before the tenancy or licence was granted and also at the time it comes to an end, the landlord or licensor occupied as his only or principal home premises of which the whole or part of the shared accommodation formed part. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 10:35 am
" But in Parts III-B and III-C, "the Chief Justice explained that an alternative reading was fairly possible. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 9:10 am
» Die Ausnahmen, zum Beispiel für die «Ausschmückung von Festen und Veranstaltungen» (Art. 8 Abs. 4 lit. b WSchG), greifen vorliegend nicht. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 7:37 am
” The plaintiff alleges that the defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 3:59 am
Intitulé : R. c. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 9:30 pm
Walker, Avery White, Michael Neblo, Jeremy Kessler, Charles Sabel, Cass R. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 4:48 pm
Biss's behavior—coupled with the facts that (a) the privilege was raised, (b) the privilege was perhaps withdrawn after a lengthy sidebar, and (c) Mr. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 4:34 pm
The interplay between EPO and national proceedings may take various forms. [read post]
