Search for: "BOX v. STATE"
Results 3021 - 3040
of 5,284
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2021, 4:34 am
Nat’l des Appellations D’Origine v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 1:30 am
This writer commends the government for its bold initiative, following its Australian cousins across the way.The Regulations were challenged in the High Court by all of the major tobacco companies (British American Tobacco (UK) Ltd & Ors, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary Of State For Health), where the companies, as summarized by Mr. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 9:47 pm
Only a year later, he signed a will stating that he had no children and never mentioning the plaintiff. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 5:07 am
The case is Eric Victor Burdon v John Steel Case O-369-13 of 9 September, a decision of Katfriend Geoffrey Hobbs QC in his capacity as an Appointed Person. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 11:12 am
U.S. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 3:56 am
Sony Group Corporation v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 11:03 pm
In 2011, the state’s highest court told law enforcement that the smell of smoked pot (alone) doesn’t give police the right to warrantless searches. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 11:59 am
Related Cases: United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 8:15 am
Client undone by drugs + gun.United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 9:17 pm
That was the case in the recent appeal of Harbur v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 4:45 am
An Employer's Misstep Discussed… — via Jeff Nowak’s FMLA Insights Unanimous Supreme Court Rules Employer Need Not Pay for Worker Security Screenings: Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 5:00 am
The additional measure of spreading the jury out in the jury box and out into the gallery has led the court to utilize technology to stream the trial proceedings to monitors and screens in other rooms in the courthouse in the event members of the parties' families or members of the public wish to view the proceedings.In the medical malpractice case of Snyder v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 12:12 pm
Just before we rang in the New Year, the DC Circuit gave us Rollins v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 5:01 am
Jablonski v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 4:43 am
It’s been nearly a year since the EEOC updated its administrative guidance on pregnancy discrimination to account for the Supreme Court’s holding in Young v. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 11:02 am
Trade Marks GuestKat Nedim Malovic commented on the CJEU judgment in Ferrari SpA v DU, C–720/18 and C–721/18 concerning the scope of ‘genuine use’ in trade mark law. [read post]
10 Aug 2013, 2:22 pm
In the case of 20th Century Fox Film Corporation v. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 8:48 am
A judge in New York City declines to do, and the law remains on the books.The case is Silberberg v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 3:26 pm
[Credit for this out-of-the-box thinking goes to Sir Robin]. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 2:59 am
Cosmetic Warriors Limited v. [read post]
