Search for: "BOX v. STATE"
Results 3021 - 3040
of 5,284
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2013, 2:22 pm
In the case of 20th Century Fox Film Corporation v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 6:24 am
According to the INA Section 203(b) states, in pertinent part, that: (1) Priority workers – visas shall first be made available… to qualified immigrants who are aliens described in any of the following sub-paragraphs (A) through (C): (A) Aliens with extraordinary – an alien is described in this sub-paragraph if- (i) The alien has extraordinary ability in the sciences, arts, education, business, or athletes which has been demonstrated by sustained… [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 3:24 pm
We've noted a number of such cases in recent weeks but take, for example, the recent decision of Cordy v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 11:00 am
As the Court held in Fisher v. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 3:32 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 6:45 am
(Eugene Volokh) I recently read an interesting tort case, Stephens v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
In Perry and United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 1:15 pm
” Howell v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 1:18 pm
Co. of Connecticut v. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 8:57 am
Stated another way, the nurses are not paid a flat rate or piece rate per shift. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 7:07 am
In the district court, defendant AHRN moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim, arguing that plaintiff MRIS did not own the copyrights in the photographs sued upon since the assignments between it and its subscribers were not memorialized in a signed writing as mandated by Section 204(a). [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 10:41 am
See Villon v. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 3:35 pm
The full decision can be read at: Decision [1]Salinger v. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 9:10 am
By Eric Goldman Lisa Zaltz v. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 3:47 pm
The language used was that specifically suggested by the Court of Appeals in the case of People v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 3:37 pm
Thus far, PAGA immunity from FAA preemption has been confirmed, both in California state court (Brown v. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 12:12 pm
” However, both of these exemptions require that the fund securities must be offered and sold without any marketing to the public in the United States. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 3:13 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 8:17 am
In light of the Supreme Court's focus in United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 5:09 pm
United States v. [read post]
