Search for: "Bare v. Bare" Results 3021 - 3040 of 5,021
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2015, 4:37 am by David DePaolo
I couldn't even reach the barf bags...Fortunately my zen-like focus quelled the queasiness, and I made an otherwise uneventful landing, and I actually felt quite fine on final approach.And yesterday the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed SB 863's imposition of a lien activation fee in Angelotti Chiropractic v. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 5:08 am by Julian Davis Mortenson
As an evidentiary matter, the material they present barely scratches the surface. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 12:47 pm
The Primates' Meeting, as we see, is being bypassed in favor of a gathering of primates; whether another Lambeth Conference will be called is doubtful; and no one particularly cares whether or not the Anglican Consultative Council continues to meet, because it has lost its constituencies in the debacle over the Anglican Covenant.In short, the fabric of the Anglican Communion is torn, exactly as predicted by the primates in 2003 before ECUSA took the step which the Communion asked it not to… [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 1:16 am by Jani Ihalainen
This puzzling question landed on the CJEU's desk late last month, which sets an interesting precedent for future infringement cases.The case of Mitsubishi Shoji Kaisha Limited v Duma Forklifts NV concerns the sale of Mitsubishi forklifts, for which Mitsubishi's European arm has the exclusive rights to. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 5:00 am by Michael Risch
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in TC Heartland v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 4:30 am by Donna Ballman
To understand the rights of soon-to-be parents, read Robin Shea's EEOC’s revised pregnancy guidance: Now, just barely more flexible! [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 10:52 pm
The Daily Business Review has also written a couple of stories about the Jean v Tylman race. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Citing People v Iannone, 45 NY2d 589, in which the Court of Appeals held that, "[w]hen indicting for statutory crimes, it is usually sufficient to charge the language of the statute unless that language is too broad," the Appellate Division opined that "by requiring [Corrections] to prove the underlying crime in the notice to support [applying] the CBA's time exception," the arbitrator essentially added a term to the CBA and, thus, exceeded his authority. [read post]
8 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  They narrate the story—in which the Cherokee Nation’s startling victory in Worcester v. [read post]