Search for: "Child v. Child"
Results 3021 - 3040
of 31,278
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2012, 5:36 am
S.S. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 10:03 am
Velozny v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 2:51 pm
The child wanted to remain living with his step-mother. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 6:55 am
In a recent child custody and visitation case, Michael Gerald D. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 2:59 am
I reported on the Baxendale v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 6:22 am
Lepis v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 11:39 am
Howard v. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 2:41 pm
That was not the case in U.S. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 2:12 pm
In the Matter of Grisanti v. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 10:42 am
Maness v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 2:53 am
Brough v Law and another [2011] EWCA Civ 1183; [2011] WLR (D) 300 “A maintenance assessment under which an absent parent was liable to pay maintenance in respect of a qualifying child to the parent with care did not end as a result of a brief reconciliation between the parents within paragraph 16(1)(b) of Schedule 1 to the Child Support Act 1991 as read with section 3 of that Act.” WLR Daily, 20th October 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 2:57 am
Regina v S(C): [2012] EWCA Crim 389; [2012] WLR (D) 54 “Where the purpose of a legislative scheme was to ensure that a child could be subject to the protection of the court, there would be no defence of necessity available in respect of the offence of removing a child from the jurisdiction of England and Wales.” WLR Daily, 29th February 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:40 am
Div. of Youth & Family Servs. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 8:07 am
In a 9-0 decision released today, in Ohio v. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 10:00 am
GORSKI V. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 10:43 am
See Osborn v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 1:53 pm
Div. of Youth and Family Servs. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 6:43 am
In Fuentes Rangel v Woodman, --- Fed.Appx. ----, 2015 WL 3405132 (C.A.11 (Ga.)) [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 10:02 am
N.J. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 1:16 pm
The Supreme Court's 4-1 decision Tuesday in the case of Sophia Willis v. [read post]