Search for: "Companies A, B, and C" Results 3021 - 3040 of 12,890
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2015, 6:19 am by Joy Waltemath
With respect to the Penske companies’ reliance on Sec. 1401(b)(3), the appeals court pointed out that if there were any tension between subsection (b)(3) (providing for use of FAA procedures for arbitration proceedings) and subsection (b)(2) (providing for civil actions to review arbitration awards), subsection (b)(3) requires that subsection (b)(2) govern, as subsection (b)(3) expressly limits applicability of the FAA “to… [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 5:09 am by Daniel Schwartz
”  Thus, the company satisfied the criteria for the exemption under Part B. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 2:00 am by Peter Mahler
Under §11(c)(7) of the new LLC Act, the grounds for dissolution in §48(a)(4) and (5) cannot be varied by the operating agreement. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 7:31 pm by Josh Blackman
Labor Code § 2750.3(c)(2)(B)(ix) and (x), Defendant, acting under color of state law, limits AB 5's exemption for "professional services" as applied to speaking professionals who engage in still photography, photojournalism, freelance writing, and editing to only 35 content submissions per publisher per year. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 9:21 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The first offense is a Class C misdemeanor, but the second offense is a Class B. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 7:37 am by The White Law Group
(CRD#:16783), LAGUNA HILLS, CA B, 01/23/2008 – 12/31/2013, BERTHEL, FISHER & COMPANY FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
(Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) The most-consulted French-language decision was Baulne c. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 9:35 am by Jon Brodkin
"[B]roadband providers that sought to offer pay-for-priority services would have an incentive to limit the quality of service provided to non-prioritized traffic," the rules state. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 12:42 pm
In the case, law enforcement agents required Melvin Skinner’s cell phone company to provide them with his GPS coordinates continuously for three days as he drove across the country. [read post]
6 May 2010, 1:02 pm by David Jacobson
C v Telecommunications Company [2010] PrivCmrA 4: A telecommunications company listed a payment default on the complainant’s consumer credit file. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:13 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
PwC v SAAD Investments Company Ltd (In Liquidation), heard 29-30 April. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 11:00 pm by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (A) (a Child) (by her litigation friend B) v Secretary of State for Health, heard 2 November 2016. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 1:15 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (A) (a Child) (by her litigation friend B) v Secretary of State for Health, heard 2 November 2016. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (A) (a Child) (by her litigation friend B) v Secretary of State for Health, heard 2 November 2016. [read post]