Search for: "Cooper v. United States" Results 3021 - 3040 of 3,923
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
: L’Oréal v Bellure (IPKat) Is the ruling in L’Oréal v Bellure against the law? [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 5:01 pm by The CGCP Team
Gechlik observes: Finding cybernorms that are acceptable to the United States and China, which have different ideologies and practices as well as enormous interests at stake, is challenging. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 7:14 am by Jorge Contreras
In its unanimous 2013 decision in Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
16 Jan 2025, 7:00 am by Just Security
” Are you committed to continuing the effort to police the Department’s use of commercial data, to improving its policies and controls, and to minimize the amount of data it collects on individuals in the United States? [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
Supreme Court The most significant US Supreme Court decision in this area since our last round-up is one that we trailed in January of this year, in United States v Jones (10-1259 01/23/2012). [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am by Joel R. Brandes
The instructions to said Packets shall instruct litigants that they may include a request for transfer of title to the marital home, cooperative apartment or condominium apartment in their request for ancillary relief in the summons with notice or verified complaint, and shall provide instructions as to what must be done to effectuate a transfer. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:00 am by James F. Aspell
Instead of an increase in cost per treatment or per unit cost of a service such as a doctor’s visit, it is the amount of services and the types of services being used driving medical inflation. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am by INFORRM
On Tuesday 18 July 2023 there was a hearing in the case of Coopers Fire Limited v Mcloughlin. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 5:08 am
The requirement to investigate does not depend on a complaint from the victim or next-of-kin: once the matter has come to the attention of the authorities they must act of their own motion (see, mutatis mutandis, Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 69, ECHR 2002-II). [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
With the regulatory stories of 2012 coming to an end, RegBlog would like to take this opportunity to reflect back on what has been a year of significant regulatory developments in the United States and throughout the world. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 6:57 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, in United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 6:57 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, in United States v. [read post]