Search for: "Corporations 1 through 5" Results 3021 - 3040 of 8,802
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2012, 9:00 am by David Cosgrove
(Opinion at 58-59).The attorneys at Cosgrove Law Group, LLC spent approximately five (5) months briefing the various post-Award issues in this matter. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 11:46 pm
See id. at 257 (outlining four factors to determine reasonableness; "(1) does the corporation maintain a policy banning personal or other objectionable use, (2) does the company monitor the use of the employee's computer or e-mail, (3) do third parties have a right of access to the computer or e-mails, and (4) did the corporation notify the employee, or was the employee aware, of the use and monitoring policies? [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 6:55 am by Kevin LaCroix
”   The complaint alleges that the defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. [read post]
21 May 2014, 9:19 am by James C. Freije
According to the SEC, more than 1,400 investors were defrauded into investing more than $300 million through purchases of units at Cay Clubs’ resort locations based on promises of, among other things, immediate income from a guaranteed 15-percent return and a future income stream through a rental program. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 10:14 pm
(8-CA-33708-1; 350 NLRB No. 85) Bluffton, OH Sept. 7, 2007. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 11:21 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The Pukke and two key individual defendants and some of the defaulted corporations timely appealed. [read post]
22 Jul 2017, 10:37 am by Bill Marler
The number of ill persons identified in each state with the outbreak strain was as follows: Arkansas (1), Arizona (4), California (8), Colorado (1), Georgia (8), Illinois (18), Indiana (1), Kentucky (1), Louisiana (2), Massachusetts (1), Minnesota (3), Missouri (3), Nebraska (2), Nevada (1), New Jersey (1), New Mexico (3), New York (9), Ohio (1), Oklahoma (1), Pennsylvania (2), Tennessee (1), Texas (25),… [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 11:50 am
These ownership and holding period thresholds represent a departure from the June 2009 proposal, which called for scaled ownership requirements of 1%, 3% and 5% based on company size and a 1-year holding period. [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 3:00 am by LindaMBeale
[edited to rephrase and correct typos 12/26/11 5 pm] Joseph Rago and Paul Gigot interviewed Mitt Romney on his 'vision' for America--"On Taxes, 'Modeling', and the Vision Thing", Wall St. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 9:04 pm by Dan Flynn
The 10 confirmed patients were from four states – Arizona (1), Kansas (5), Oklahoma (1), and Texas (3). [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
Ten people with listeriosis were associated with the outbreak from four states: Arizona (1), Kansas (5), Oklahoma (1), and Texas (3). [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 8:59 am by Celeste Blackburn
Debt reduction and fiscal fitness for families, by the radio talk-show host. 5. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 7:06 am
However, the statute’s anti-waiver provision prohibited the waiver of rights secured by the MFA through a choice of law provisions only if the waiver purported to bind (1) a person who was a Minnesota resident (or Minnesota corporation) at the time the that person or organization acquired a franchise or (2) a person (regardless of residence) who was acquiring a franchise that would operate in Minnesota. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 6:30 pm
Specifically, The Taxpayer Responsibility, Accountability and Consistency Act of 2009 amends the Internal Revenue Code to: (1) Require reporting to the IRS of payments of $600 or more made to corporations; (2) Set forth criteria and rules relating to the treatment of workers as employees or independent contractors; and (3) Increase penalties for failure to file correct tax return information or comply with other information reporting requirements. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:15 pm by Francis G.X. Pileggi
Short Summary of Ruling The detailed legal analysis in this opinion deserves comprehensive treatment, but for purposes of this brief blog blurb I am only going to highlight some of the key issues in this ruling: 1)         In a double derivative suit, because the parent corporation determines, through its 100% control of the subsidiary, whether or not the subsidiary will sue, there is no basis in law or logic to require a separate… [read post]