Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 3021 - 3040
of 15,515
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2012, 5:46 pm
The Upper Tribunal has handed down judgment in the case of Raed Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department IA/21/21631/2011. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Knellinger v. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 1:30 pm
The post Cruz v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 3:40 am
To say that the twin decisions had a substantial impact is to grossly understate the situation: panicked prosecutors tried to figure out how to phrase their indictments, and puzzled appellate judges tried to figure out if they’d done so correctly. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 2:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 6:00 am
But what’s interesting about Apple v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 8:31 am
In January, Reexamination Alert reported on the case Tele-Publishing, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 8:31 am
In January, Reexamination Alert reported on the case Tele-Publishing, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 9:10 am
V. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 4:30 am
Figure 1 Washbowl with recesses from the 793 Patent The MFP washbowl does not have separate recesses; instead it has single, undulating, ridge that runs around the whole bowl, as shown in Figure 2 below. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 7:46 am
On 9 November 2021, the Supreme Court heard the appeal in Harpur Trust v Brazel. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 1:15 am
Over the years of this Apple v. [read post]
19 May 2018, 12:09 pm
It would have been preferable to give the Apple v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 5:18 am
Critically, the PSA established that such figures were based on an income of $117,000 for the husband and $29,000 for the defendant. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 6:28 am
The first article in the issue is titled “Plessy v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 4:17 am
In EB Brands Holdings, Inc. v McGladrey, LLP 2017 NY Slip Op 06923 [154 AD3d 646] October 4, 2017 Appellate Division, Second Department ended the entire case on statute of limitations, when it had originally been timely brought. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 6:28 am
The first article in the issue is titled “Plessy v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 7:21 am
On Thursday I watched closing arguments in the case of Theresa Foster v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 2:28 pm
The formula is called this because of a 1984 case called Bangs v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:54 am
I figured losing his attorney would spell the end of Jurin's quest, but no! [read post]
