Search for: "Germany v. Germany" Results 3021 - 3040 of 4,535
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2012, 10:34 am by Florian Mueller
In the Apple-Samsung context I wrote in a standard-essential Samsung v. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 3:10 am by Florian Mueller
Yesterday the initial determination on remand came down in the Motorola v. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 7:52 pm by Larry Catá Backer
Jindal Global University; Formerly Professor and Dean, Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, India Enforcing Socio-Economic Rights through Public Interest Litigation: An Overview of the Indian Experience 3) Dr Leïla Choukroune, Senior Lecturer in International Economic Law, Faculty of Law, Maastricht University, The Netherlands The Paradox of Justiciability: Labour PIL in China and India Questions/Comments 6:30pm-8:30pm – Welcome Dinner hosted by the City University Law School (by… [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 6:36 am by Jack Goldsmith
Watkins 335 U.S. 160 (1948) for the proposition that “the President’s authority to detain German nationals continued for over six years after the fighting with Germany had ended. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 11:27 am by Florian Mueller
I said the same about another Dutch case based on which Apple will owe damages (and future license fees) to Samsung.Last week I reported on a German appeals court hearing involving this patent (in an Apple v. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 7:01 am by Florian Mueller
Let me quote two paragraphs from one of Judge Koh's claim construction orders in Apple v. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 5:15 am by Gritsforbreakfast
In the wake of the David Petraeus scandal, in which the FBI gained back-end access to the gmail accounts of the CIA director's paramour, I ran across Google's semi-annual transparency statement, in which we learn that in the first six months of 2012, Google granted all or part of 90% of information requests from US law enforcement agencies, handing out information on 16,281 users in response to 7,969 requests.Comparing requests by country (Google provides only top-line national data, so we… [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 1:43 pm by Allard Knook
The Court held that that the procedure established under Art. 259 TFEU was designed to obtain a declaration that the conduct of a Member State was in breach of EU law and to terminate that conduct (see, to that effect, Joined Cases 15/76 and 16/76 France v Commission [1979]; Case C-456/05 Commission v Germany [2007]; and Joined Cases C-514/07 P, C-528/07 P and C-532/07 P Sweden and Others v API and Commission [2010]).Thus, as the aim of the Treaty was to achieve… [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 7:50 am
gives a keenly-awaited Opinion in Joined Cases C-274/11 and C-295/11 Spain v Council and Italy v Council. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 6:57 am
Richard observes that these comments are made all the more relevant by the recent Kat-rant over the pathetically short time available for consultation in Actavis v Sanofi, a reference to the CJEU in which, this Kat believes, a good case could be made out for a more generous time allowance given the political and economic significance of the case's outcome. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
 It is true that the circumstances were unusual with very substantial media coverage of the injunction obtained by Apple in Germany which Samsung claimed had led to drop in market share for it from 10% to 1%. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 10:39 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
Justice Jackson wrote in his dissent in Beauharnais v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 9:33 am
Luisa Vierucci, The No-Fly Zone Over Libya: Enforcement Issues Giuseppe Nesi, Recognition of the Libyan National Transitional Council: When, How and Why Giorgio Sacerdoti & Pia Acconci, The Security Council’s Asset Freeze Against Gaddafi’s Libya and Its Implementation in Italy Marina Mancini, The Day After: Prosecuting International Crimes Committed in Libya Ciaran Burke, Beyond Libya: Moral Norms in International Law and the Use of Force by States Focus: The ICJ Judgment in… [read post]