Search for: "Head v. Head" Results 3021 - 3040 of 19,775
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division opined that "Although extending the retractable head portion of the stretcher was no doubt part of [Petitioner's] job duties, the precipitating external event, i.e., the jamming of the retractable head section of the stretcher, was sudden, unexpected and not a risk in his ordinary employment duties" and appeared to have been caused by a malfunction in the equipment. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 9:02 am by Liisa Speaker
The first time, the court remanded for an evidentiary hearing under People v Ginther, 390 Mich 436 (1973). [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division opined that "Although extending the retractable head portion of the stretcher was no doubt part of [Petitioner's] job duties, the precipitating external event, i.e., the jamming of the retractable head section of the stretcher, was sudden, unexpected and not a risk in his ordinary employment duties" and appeared to have been caused by a malfunction in the equipment. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 3:28 am by Eleonora Rosati
DiscoveryDev Gangjee, Professor of Intellectual Property Law, University of OxfordStephen Reid, Head of Intellectual Property at Imperial Brands PLC 15:40-16:00 – The future of trade marks – revisited (Darren Meale)16:00-16:30 – Coffee/tea break16:30-17:15 – Keynote address: Allan James, Senior Hearing Officer, UKIPO17:15-18:15 – Panel 2 – A worthy wordless win or a Clubcard calamity? [read post]
14 May 2008, 1:12 am
 All I have time for today is this link to a recent Anita Lee story in the Sun Herald (thanks to Ted Frank of Overlawyered and Point of Law for the heads up) about the Renfroe v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 10:30 pm by Ilya Somin
Recently, the Montana Supreme Court issued a decision in PPL Montana v. [read post]