Search for: "Holder v. United States"
Results 3021 - 3040
of 3,863
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
' Court of Appeal rules... - Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak) United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
– Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak) United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
– Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak) United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am
Apart from his ACA decisions, in his dissent in Obergefell v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 6:29 am
Gore, which decided the 2000 presidential election, and Citizens United v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 5:56 am
As Jay noted here, Holder v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:46 am
Lawrence Lessig ‘on the economics’: curse of the copyright holders (Copyright Litigation Blog) US Copyright Decisions District Court Massachusetts: Not much hope left – copyright claim time-barred, claim for unjust enrichment pre-empted: Jürek Zamoyski v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
” This matter involved the regulatory authority of the Board and the County, not any relief against individual water rights holders. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 9:47 am
Since the Klass and others v. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 4:12 pm
United KingdomThe Duchess of Sussex v. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
In addition, as articulated in United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 6:18 am
Such remedies should include judicial and non-judicial remedies compatible with the Third Pillar duties and responsibilities of States under the United Nations Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
In Capitol Records v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am
Holder and who represent the challenger in Fisher v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 9:21 am
This is a considerable shift from present practices of the United States. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 9:54 am
NOTORIOUS INFRINGERS (Section 107) SOPA also provides that the Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator ("IPEC") shall "conduct an analysis of notorious foreign infringers whose activities cause significant harm to holders of intellectual property rights in the United States. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 7:30 pm
Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:39 pm
Cir. 2012) (quoting United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 11:35 am
Wiley won the case with the Second Circuit ruling that the first sale doctrine only applies to goods manufactured in the United States. [read post]
