Search for: "Human v. State"
Results 3021 - 3040
of 19,128
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
Rothera, The Tenacious "Twin Relic": Republicans, Polygamy, and The Late Corporation of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
Courts may not interfere with an administrative tribunal's proper exercise of its discretionMatter of Seebald v New York State Div. of Human Rights and Roswell Park Cancer Inst. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
Courts may not interfere with an administrative tribunal's proper exercise of its discretionMatter of Seebald v New York State Div. of Human Rights and Roswell Park Cancer Inst. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 7:39 pm
ALLEGATIONS OF GENOCIDE UNDER THE CONVENTION ON THEPREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE(UKRAINE v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 7:10 am
In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps weighs in on Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:06 pm
The federal case of The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) v. [read post]
8 May 2022, 2:26 pm
Russian propaganda The EU action is considered to be in line with Article 3(5) and (6) of the Treaty on European Union (TEU), which states, inter alia, that in its relations with the wider world, the Union shall uphold its values and interests, and that the EU shall contribute to peace, security, the sustainable development of the Earth, solidarity and mutual respect among peoples, and the protection of human rights. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm
United States and Printz v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
See paras 23 – 29 of R (English UK Ltd) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 1726 for a further explanation of the workings of PBS. [read post]
28 May 2008, 6:37 am
The European Court of Human Rights ruled on May 27 in N v. the United Kingdom, Application No. 26565/05, that the United Kingdom's demand that a Ugandan woman living with AIDS return to her home country does not violate the U.K.'s obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm
The case is reported as Duckworth v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:10 am
Supreme Court granted New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance's [ODTA] CPLR §211 motion to dismiss the Petitioner's claims against it under the New York City Human Rights Law [City HRL] alleging national origin discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law [State HRL], and for alleged violation of Civil Service Law §75-b. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:10 am
Supreme Court granted New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance's [ODTA] CPLR §211 motion to dismiss the Petitioner's claims against it under the New York City Human Rights Law [City HRL] alleging national origin discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law [State HRL], and for alleged violation of Civil Service Law §75-b. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
In Martinez v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:10 am
Supreme Court granted New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance's [ODTA] CPLR §211 motion to dismiss the Petitioner's claims against it under the New York City Human Rights Law [City HRL] alleging national origin discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law [State HRL], and for alleged violation of Civil Service Law §75-b. [read post]
31 May 2023, 8:00 am
# # #DECISIONR. v New York State Ins. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:10 am
Supreme Court granted New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance's [ODTA] CPLR §211 motion to dismiss the Petitioner's claims against it under the New York City Human Rights Law [City HRL] alleging national origin discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law [State HRL], and for alleged violation of Civil Service Law §75-b. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 4:13 pm
The claimant stated that this did not happen. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 5:56 pm
Geir v. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 2:59 am
CBS and BPI v. [read post]
