Search for: "In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10" Results 3021 - 3040 of 5,511
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2022, 7:56 am by OTy9gYz
Diana Al-Hadid Justice Nock ruled that the agreement between Boesky and Al-Hadid “did not evince an intent to create joint ownership in defendant’s work,” and thus the Gallery has no claim to ownership.[10] The agreement only created a consignment through which the Gallery would sell the sculptures for Al-Hadid in exchange for one-third of the sales proceeds. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 11:57 am by Ted Allen
” The SEC’s draft proxy access rule calls for a sliding ownership threshold for investor groups that ranges from 1 to 5 percent depending on a firm's market cap, and would impose a one-year holding period. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 12:11 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Need for better deterrent to claim arbitrage; some hope that Lenz will improve matters, at least for problem (1). [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 7:38 am by Jacquelyn Greene
  Amendment to Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.100(A). 796 So.2d 470 (2001). [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
A court’s authority to compel arbitration under the Act does not extend to all private contracts, no matter how emphatically they may express a preference for arbitration. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 7:44 pm
ECLS 2014 Annual Conference Making, Enforcing and Accessing the Law Chinese University of Hong Kong, 15‐16 November 2014 Conference Programme (as of 7 Nov)DAY 1: SATURDAY, 15 NOVEMBER, 2014 Morning Sessions: (Ballroom, Harbour Grand Hong Kong, North Point, Hong Kong) 08:30 - 09:00 Registration and Coffee09:00 - 09:15 Welcome  Professor Benjamin Wah, Provost, CUHK  Professor Christopher Gane, Dean, CUHK Faculty of Law  Professor Dr Knut Pissler, Chairman, ECLS… [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 12:21 am by Eleonora Rosati
A lot has changed over that time, but the trade mark cases keep coming.Here’s another 10 highlights for your consideration.1. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Rather, those members think that such shaming is an important and valuable feature of their religious life, and indeed of their exercising their First Amendment rights.[1] We believe that stripping, premarital sex, taking disputes to outsiders ("lashon hara," to Orthodox Jews[2]), drinking, gambling, or lending or borrowing money with interest, they might say, is contrary to God's will. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
An important First Amendment case decided in 2012 is that of Hosanna Tabor v EEOC (10-553 01/11/2012), which concerned a ‘ministerial exception’ to the operation of Federal discrimination laws. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
In relation to the continuing website publication the “Times” argues that, in the context of the ongoing litigation it was entitled to decide not to update or amend the article on the website before trial. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
In relation to the continuing website publication the “Times” argues that, in the context of the ongoing litigation it was entitled to decide not to update or amend the article on the website before trial. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 4:28 am
On January 1, 2006, China implemented its New Company Law. [read post]
30 Jun 2007, 1:50 pm
(p)(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2) of this subsection and sections 544 and 548, as a result of electing under subsection (b)(3)(A) to exempt property under State or local law, a debtor may not exempt any amount of interest that was acquired by the debtor during the 1215-day period preceding the date of the filing of the petition that exceeds in the aggregate $125,000 [$125,000 (added by BAPCPA 10-17-05) effective 4-1-04. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
In view of the right of the applicant to amend alone, the outcome of the decision concerning the refund of a search fee does not necessarily have a correlation with the outcome of the decision on the grant or the refusal of the application itself. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 1:28 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
“Given the issue of whether the Tokens are a “security” is a genuinely unanswered legal question, it would be unfair (and contrary to Rule 8) to prohibit alternative pleading at this stage of the litigation. [read post]