Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE"
Results 3021 - 3040
of 42,197
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2011, 2:47 am
Why the Case is Interesting: As a practical matter, this new decision may soften the impact of the First Circuit’s original 2004 ruling. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:47 am
Why the Case is Interesting: As a practical matter, this new decision may soften the impact of the First Circuit’s original 2004 ruling. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 3:18 am
Ruling that the USPTO failed to meet its burden to provide clear evidence that THUMBDRIVE is generic, the Board reversed a refusal to register the mark for portable digital electronic storage devices. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 9:48 am
Therefore, by the time the Supreme Court ruled, the parties only disagreed about whether the Second Circuit had properly considered the generic nature of Goldman’s alleged misrepresentations.The district court’s decision granting class certification did not discuss the generic nature of the statements in evaluating the evidence relevant to price impact, nor did it discuss the expert reports dealing with the generic nature of the statements. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 7:39 am
That's not to say the rule can't change--it may be changing through this process of doctrinal accretion--but materiality is quite often a matter of common sense where a claim is central to performance or related to health or safety, and that treatment makes plenty of sense.]Here, there was no evidence of consumer reaction, and evidence that they didn’t simply take [24]7’s statements at face value in making purchasing decisions. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 4:21 am
Rules, you know. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 11:06 am
The Illinois Supreme Court overturned an Appellate Court ruling regarding parents' liability for underage drinking on their premises in Bell v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 11:06 am
The Illinois Supreme Court overturned an Appellate Court ruling regarding parents' liability for underage drinking on their premises in Bell v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 10:39 am
The defense in this matter sought access to the Plaintiff's Facebook pages to seek out evidence related to the Plaintiff's claims of injury and impairment. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:10 am
The Privacy Commissioner ruled against Facebook in 2019, but Facebook disagreed with the findings and took the matter to court. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 9:27 am
Once promulgated, this will allow the parties and judges to have clear guidance about the discovery to be conducted and the evidence judges should consider in adjudicating MPCs.5. [read post]
21 May 2020, 6:20 am
We contend that, in environments with weak legal rules related to investor protection and poor enforcement of these rules, concerns about operational risks are amplified. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 6:00 am
Appellees submitted no summary evidence that Doe actually accessed the intranet site. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 8:38 am
Conclusion The attorney-client privilege is an exception to the general rule that relevant evidence is admissible. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 5:30 am
The only claim in this matter against the Co-Defendant hospital was premised on its vicarious liability for the actions of the gynecologist who was allegedly acting as an ostensible agent of the hospital. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
Supreme Court granted the Employer's motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Article 75 petition seeking to vacate an arbitration award, which ruling Plaintiff appealed to the Appellate Division. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
Supreme Court granted the Employer's motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Article 75 petition seeking to vacate an arbitration award, which ruling Plaintiff appealed to the Appellate Division. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
"** Noting there was documentary evidence of Plaintiff's unsatisfactory performance while a probationary teacher, the Appellate Division viewed this evidence to have "sufficiently rebutted any allegations of bad faith" and the fact that Plaintiff "received two effective ratings ... underscore that the administrators at his school treated him fairly. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 12:34 pm
The estate of Lowenberg then filed a motion requesting to examine Clink's hair follicle samples for evidence of controlled substances, per Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 196.1(b) and 204.1(a). [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
Also, the medical evidence appeared to confirm that the Plaintiff may have sustained an ankle sprain for which she had minimal and conservative treatment. [read post]
