Search for: "Matter of Jones"
Results 3021 - 3040
of 5,323
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2012, 2:07 pm
I believe that the 1st and 4th Amendments still matter in the Social Media Age and I want to protect students, schools, and taxpayers from unforeseen legal issues that may arise if these practices continue. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 10:37 pm
" The fact of the matter, is that China is a developing country, currently in the lower middle income range. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 12:32 pm
This court also based its decision on the in-camera with the Jones children and the recommendation of the Law Guardian. [read post]
22 May 2015, 3:51 am
Jones, this is a fabulous deal. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 6:00 am
The Court found the punitive damage award against Exxon was excessive as a matter of maritime common law, and that “in the circumstances of this case the award should be limited to an amount equal to compensatory damages. [read post]
27 May 2011, 7:34 am
Sally Jones is an employee of Rob Robinson. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 1:00 am
In the matter of C (Children), heard 9-10 Oct 2017. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 10:00 am
In April, in Ex Parte Jones, a Texas appellate court ruled that Texas’ NCP law was unconstitutional. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 5:00 am
Click here for the full Jones Day publication. [read post]
18 Jun 2022, 3:01 pm
In general, maritime lawyers dedicate themselves to handling maritime matters. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 7:46 am
De Havilland claimed that Catherine Zeta-Jones’s portrayal of her in the show (which lasted all of 17 minutes) violated her right of publicity because she did not give the creators of Feud permission to use her name or identity. [read post]
20 May 2009, 5:39 am
Justice Jones characterized it has mandatory and refused to grant it while the Court of Appeal characterized it as prohibitory and granted it. [read post]
22 May 2012, 10:00 pm
“Jones Co. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 10:00 am
In Jones v. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 1:36 pm
Discussing Jones, 655 N.E.2d at 56, the Court in Cooley v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:40 am
United States, and this Court’s recent opinions in Medina, Miller, and Jones. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 1:13 pm
In Hamm-Jones v Jones, 788 N.Y.S.2d 690 (N.Y. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 5:40 am
And does it matter? [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:58 am
Jones, 88 Ohio St.3d 430, 727 N.E.2d 886 (2000) (Jones I) (Whether a search or seizure is reasonable is determined by weighing the competing interests involved and considering the extent of the officer’s intrusion on an individual’s liberty and privacy against the need to promote legitimate governmental interests.) [read post]
12 May 2021, 8:08 pm
Martinez and Jones contend that the case is a poor vehicle. [read post]
