Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 3021 - 3040
of 4,554
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2013, 1:17 pm
We've been informed by counsel that the Dobbs litigation - the case that brought us Dobbs v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 8:59 am
See Exxon Mobil Corp. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 7:13 am
That is precisely what we are demanding from the US. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 12:50 pm
(holding "Texas courts have held that use of any one particular approach as the sole standard from which to derive value is fundamentally wrong" and that it is the jury's duty to weigh conflicting expert testimony on value). [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:08 am
Brod v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 9:36 am
He lamented the uncertainty created by the US Supreme Court's odd ruling in US v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 7:52 am
The Court ruled the other way in that particular case (Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 6:01 am
Then, in Katz v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm
This standard provides, where necessary, a familiar tool to assess the basis for the issues raised in a given Rule 1925(b) statement. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 5:03 am
Bezdek v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
The case, Clapper v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 7:00 am
What’s more, the precise legal theory may vary somewhat depending on whether military or covert forces do the targeting. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 6:49 am
U.S. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 5:34 am
See Lamere v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 12:44 pm
The “Eighth Amendment” standard the Supreme Court has developed in non-capital cases stems entirely from state cases: Rummel v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:00 am
Court of Session Judge Lord Drummond Young rules lawyer had his ‘human rights’ breached by Law Society over complaint row. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:26 am
The standard of proof that the Prosecution must achieve before you could convict is s [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 1:17 am
Robart, clearly a thought leader and pioneer among U.S. federal judges with respect to FRAND, in the Microsoft v. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 10:11 am
I was also amused by: "The pubic hair is often used for a background to the most vivid and precise descriptions of the response, condition, size, shape. and color of the sexual organs before, during and after orgasms." [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 4:37 am
However, a district court's legal findings are subject to a de novo standard of review. [read post]
